Supreme Court’s Review on Medical Students’ Degree Validity and Study Continuation

The Supreme Court of India, in its recent review petition judgment, provided critical relief to medical students who were caught in a legal limbo after a previous ruling in 2022. The case of Dr. Priyambada Sharma and Others v. Board of Governors in Super Session of Medical Council of India and Others dealt with the validity of medical degrees and the rights of students who had completed their education before the judgment was passed, but were unable to continue due to the legal constraints imposed by the ruling.

This case brings to light significant issues about the continuation of studies for students whose academic progress was hindered by legal decisions that impacted their degree validity. The petitioners, including Dr. Priyambada Sharma, argued for the continuation of their studies and the validity of their degrees, which were disputed following the judgment in 2022. The Supreme Court’s decision in this matter has provided clarity on the issue and set a precedent for future cases of this nature.

Background of the Case

The petitioners, all medical students, had completed their studies by July 2022. However, due to a judgment passed by the Supreme Court on October 17, 2022, concerning the validity of certain medical degrees, their degrees were temporarily invalidated. This judgment affected students who had completed their studies but had not yet been awarded their degrees. The case was complicated by the fact that the petitioners had continued their education despite the restrictions imposed by the judgment.

Dr. Priyambada Sharma, one of the petitioners, had enrolled in the medical course in July 2019. She had completed almost three years of study before the October 2022 judgment. The judgment had restricted her continuation, but the Supreme Court allowed her to complete her studies, thereby granting her the ability to continue and finish her course at the North Bengal Medical College, Darjeeling, West Bengal.

The case also involved issues regarding the failure of certain authorities, such as the University and College, to comply with the Supreme Court’s earlier judgment, leading to delays in the students receiving their degrees and certificates.

Key Legal Issues

Whether the students who completed their medical studies before the judgment passed in 2022 were entitled to their degrees.
Whether the continuation of studies for certain medical students, including Dr. Priyambada Sharma, was legally permissible despite the prior judgment.
Whether the delay in granting degrees due to administrative failures by the University and College affected the rights of the students.
Imposition of costs on the authorities for their failure to adhere to the previous judgments regarding the petitioners’ degrees.

Arguments of the Parties

Petitioners’ Arguments

The petitioners, represented by their counsel, made the following arguments:

The petitioners had completed their studies before the 2022 judgment and should not be deprived of their degrees simply because the Court’s decision impacted the timing of their qualification.
Dr. Priyambada Sharma had already completed a significant portion of her education, and her rights to continue her studies and receive her degree should not be restricted due to the judgment.
It was unfair for the authorities to deny them their degrees when they had completed their courses in good faith and had been waiting for their degrees to be awarded.
The authorities had failed to implement the Court’s orders properly, resulting in unnecessary delays in awarding degrees and certificates to the petitioners.

Respondents’ Arguments

The respondents, represented by the Board of Governors in Super Session of the Medical Council of India and other authorities, argued:

The Court’s 2022 judgment was clear, and any degree awarded after the ruling could not be deemed valid unless the petitioners met the specific conditions set by the Court.
Dr. Priyambada Sharma had continued her studies post-judgment in violation of the directives, and therefore, her right to continue should be reconsidered.
The delays in awarding degrees were not due to any fault of the authorities but were the result of the constraints imposed by the earlier judgment and administrative processes.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court reviewed the situation and observed:

“In the case of students who have completed their courses in good faith and who were prevented from continuing due to the judicial decision, it is only fair that their degrees be considered valid. The delay in granting these degrees cannot be attributed to the students, who were acting in accordance with the guidelines available to them at the time.”

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-upholds-possession-rights-in-karnataka-property-dispute/

The Court also noted that Dr. Priyambada Sharma had almost completed her education and was denied the opportunity to finish it due to a ruling that had come after she had already started her course. The Court opined that it was reasonable to allow her to continue her education and complete her studies.

Final Judgment and Directions

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, particularly Dr. Priyambada Sharma, stating:

Dr. Priyambada Sharma was permitted to continue and complete her studies at the North Bengal Medical College, Darjeeling, West Bengal.
The degrees awarded to the petitioners, despite the judgment of October 2022, would be considered legal and valid.
The Court imposed consolidated costs of Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees five lakhs) on the authorities responsible, which should be deposited in the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund, Government of West Bengal, within four weeks from the date of the order.

Implications of the Judgment

This judgment has significant implications for medical students whose education and degrees were affected by legal rulings. It sets a precedent for considering the rights of students who are caught between judicial decisions and administrative delays, allowing them to continue their education and receive their degrees without further hindrances.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Dr. Priyambada Sharma v. The Board of Governors in Super Session of Medical Council of India & Others serves as a critical step in protecting the rights of students affected by legal decisions. It ensures that students who were unjustly deprived of their degrees due to delays or misapplications of judicial orders are not further penalized. This case highlights the importance of diligent implementation of judicial orders by authorities and the Court’s willingness to intervene when administrative failures affect students’ futures.

Petitioner Name: Dr. Priyambada Sharma.
Respondent Name: Board of Governors in Super Session of Medical Council of India & Others.
Judgment By: Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar, Justice K.V. Viswanathan.
Place Of Incident: West Bengal.
Judgment Date: 28-01-2025.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: dr.-priyambada-sharm-vs-board-of-governors-i-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-28-01-2025.pdf

Directly Download Judgment: Directly download this Judgment

See all petitions in Contract Disputes
See all petitions in Damages and Compensation
See all petitions in Workplace Harassment
See all petitions in Judgment by Sanjiv Khanna
See all petitions in Judgment by Sanjay Kumar
See all petitions in Judgment by K.V. Viswanathan
See all petitions in partially allowed
See all petitions in Modified
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments January 2025
See all petitions in 2025 judgments

See all posts in Civil Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Civil Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Civil Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Civil Cases Category