Supreme Court Validates 18-Month D.El.Ed. for In-Service Teachers: Key Takeaways image for SC Judgment dated 04-04-2025 in the case of Kousik Das & Ors. vs State of West Bengal & Ors.
| |

Supreme Court Validates 18-Month D.El.Ed. for In-Service Teachers: Key Takeaways

The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a significant judgment concerning the validity of the 18-month Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) obtained through the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) by in-service teachers. The case, titled Kousik Das & Ors. vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., revolved around the interpretation of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act) and the NCTE Regulations, 2014. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the judgment, arguments, and its implications.

Background of the Case

The dispute arose when the West Bengal Board of Primary Education (WBBPE) issued a notification in 2022 for the recruitment of Assistant Teachers. A group of candidates challenged the eligibility of teachers who had completed the 18-month D.El.Ed. programme through NIOS, arguing that it was not equivalent to the standard 2-year D.El.Ed. course. The Calcutta High Court initially ruled in favor of the petitioners, directing WBBPE to exclude NIOS-trained teachers from recruitment. This decision was upheld by the Division Bench, prompting the appellants to approach the Supreme Court.

Key Arguments

Petitioners’ Arguments

The appellants, represented by Senior Counsel Shri Gopal Sankaranarayanan and Smt. Vibha Datta Makhija, contended:

  • The 18-month D.El.Ed. programme was introduced as a one-time measure to help in-service teachers meet the RTE Act’s minimum qualifications by March 31, 2019.
  • All appellants were in-service teachers as of August 10, 2017, and had completed the 18-month course before the deadline.
  • The Supreme Court’s earlier judgment in Jaiveer Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand and the subsequent clarification in Viswanath vs. State of Uttarakhand validated their qualifications for employment and promotions.

Respondents’ Arguments

The State of West Bengal, represented by Senior Counsel Shri Jaideep Gupta, argued:

  • The 18-month programme was a temporary relaxation and not equivalent to the 2-year D.El.Ed. prescribed by the NCTE.
  • Teachers who completed the course after the cut-off date (March 31, 2019) should not be considered eligible for recruitment.
  • The High Court’s decision aligned with the NCTE’s stance on minimum qualifications for fresh appointments.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Augustine George Masih meticulously analyzed the RTE Act, the 2017 Amendment, and the NCTE Regulations. Key observations included:

“It is thus clear that the entire scheme was for the purpose of providing a window to the in-service teachers inasmuch as unless they would have acquired requisite qualifications prior to 1st April 2019, they could not have continued to remain in service and would have faced dismissal from service.”

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-landmark-judgment-on-west-bengal-primary-teacher-recruitment-eligibility-crisis/

The Court emphasized that the 18-month programme was a one-time exception for in-service teachers appointed before August 10, 2017, to retain their jobs. It was never intended to replace the 2-year D.El.Ed. for fresh recruits.

Judgment and Directions

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court’s orders. It held:

  • Teachers employed as of August 10, 2017, who completed the 18-month D.El.Ed. by March 31, 2019, are valid diploma holders.
  • Such teachers are eligible for recruitment, promotions, and applying to other institutions.
  • The WBBPE must reconsider the appellants’ candidatures within three months.

Conclusion

This judgment provides clarity on the validity of the 18-month D.El.Ed. programme and safeguards the interests of in-service teachers who availed the one-time scheme. It reaffirms the Supreme Court’s commitment to balancing regulatory standards with practical solutions for educators.


Petitioner Name: Kousik Das & Ors..
Respondent Name: State of West Bengal & Ors..
Judgment By: Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Augustine George Masih.
Place Of Incident: West Bengal.
Judgment Date: 04-04-2025.
Result: allowed.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: kousik-das-&-ors.-vs-state-of-west-bengal-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-04-04-2025.pdf

Directly Download Judgment: Directly download this Judgment

See all petitions in Employment Disputes
See all petitions in Recruitment Policies
See all petitions in Public Sector Employees
See all petitions in Education Related Cases
See all petitions in Judgment by B R Gavai
See all petitions in Judgment by Augustine George Masih
See all petitions in allowed
See all petitions in Quashed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments April 2025
See all petitions in 2025 judgments

See all posts in Service Matters Category
See all allowed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Service Matters Category

Similar Posts