Supreme Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Maharashtra

The Supreme Court, in the case of Sudhir Vilas Kalel & Ors. v. Bapu Rajaram Kalel & Ors., upheld the validity of a No Confidence Motion against the Sarpanch of Jambulani Gram Panchayat, Maharashtra. The ruling clarified the application of the Maharashtra Temporary Extension of Period for Submitting Validity Certificate Act, 2023 and reinforced procedural requirements in local governance.

Background of the Case

The dispute revolved around the validity of a No Confidence Motion against Sushila Sitaram Kalel, the elected Sarpanch of Jambulani Gram Panchayat. The case also raised a crucial issue regarding the membership of Sudhir Vilas Kalel in the Panchayat, as his membership status directly impacted the outcome of the No Confidence Motion.

On June 13, 2023, eight members of the Panchayat moved a No Confidence Motion against the Sarpanch. If Sudhir Vilas Kalel was considered a valid member, the required three-fourth majority would not have been met. However, if he was deemed disqualified, the motion would pass with the required majority.

Key Legal Issues

Whether the appellant, Sudhir Vilas Kalel, was a legally recognized member of the Panchayat at the time of the No Confidence Motion.
Whether the Maharashtra Temporary Extension Act, 2023, applied to protect his membership.
Whether the rejection of the No Confidence Motion on procedural grounds was valid.
Whether the High Court’s decision to validate the No Confidence Motion was correct.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The No Confidence Motion was invalid as it did not meet the required three-fourth majority of members “entitled to sit and vote.”
Under the Maharashtra Temporary Extension Act, 2023, Sudhir Vilas Kalel was entitled to remain a member despite delays in submitting his caste validity certificate.
The rejection of his caste validity application by the scrutiny committee should not have affected his membership.

Respondent’s Arguments

The appellant had failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of submitting his caste validity certificate within the legally prescribed time.
The rejection of his application by the scrutiny committee rendered him disqualified as a member.
The No Confidence Motion was valid as per the required three-fourth majority, considering the appellant was not legally recognized as a member at the time.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and K.V. Viswanathan, made significant observations:

“The Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act requires candidates contesting elections on reserved seats to submit a Caste Validity Certificate within a specified period.”
“The appellant failed to submit the required certificate within the stipulated twelve-month period from his election date, leading to automatic disqualification.”
“The Maharashtra Temporary Extension Act, 2023, does not apply to cases where the validity certificate application was rejected by the scrutiny committee.”
“Since the appellant’s membership was invalid, the No Confidence Motion was correctly carried by the required majority.”

Key Legal Findings

The appellant failed to meet the legal requirement of timely submission of a caste validity certificate.
The Maharashtra Temporary Extension Act, 2023, does not apply to candidates whose applications were rejected by the scrutiny committee.
The appellant was deemed automatically disqualified as a Panchayat member as of January 20, 2022.
The No Confidence Motion was validly passed with the required three-fourth majority.

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court ruled:

“The High Court’s decision is affirmed. The rejection of the No Confidence Motion is set aside. The motion is deemed validly carried, and the appellant shall cease to hold office.”

The Court also directed the concerned authorities to conduct fresh elections for the post of Sarpanch.

Key Takeaways from the Judgment

Timely submission of caste validity certificates is a mandatory requirement for elected members on reserved seats.
The Maharashtra Temporary Extension Act, 2023, does not protect candidates whose applications were rejected for non-compliance.
The No Confidence Motion process in village Panchayats must adhere strictly to procedural and statutory requirements.
Automatic disqualification provisions in electoral laws are self-executing and do not require additional adjudication.

Impact of the Judgment

This ruling strengthens electoral integrity in local governance by:

Reinforcing the importance of procedural compliance for reserved seat candidates.
Preventing attempts to circumvent election disqualification provisions through legal loopholes.
Ensuring village governance structures are not disrupted by technical delays in eligibility verification.
Providing a clear precedent for handling similar disputes regarding caste validity certificates in Maharashtra.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Sudhir Vilas Kalel & Ors. v. Bapu Rajaram Kalel & Ors. upholds the integrity of the No Confidence Motion process and affirms the automatic disqualification of candidates who fail to comply with statutory requirements. This ruling ensures that procedural lapses do not hinder democratic accountability in local self-governance.

Petitioner Name: Sudhir Vilas Kalel & Ors..
Respondent Name: Bapu Rajaram Kalel & Ors..
Judgment By: Justice Vikram Nath, Justice K.V. Viswanathan.
Place Of Incident: Jambulani Gram Panchayat, Maharashtra.
Judgment Date: 07-02-2024.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: sudhir-vilas-kalel-&-vs-bapu-rajaram-kalel-&-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-07-02-2024.pdf

Directly Download Judgment: Directly download this Judgment

See all petitions in Legislative Powers
See all petitions in Public Interest Litigation
See all petitions in Judgment by Vikram Nath
See all petitions in Judgment by K.V. Viswanathan
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments February 2024
See all petitions in 2024 judgments

See all posts in Election and Political Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Election and Political Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Election and Political Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Election and Political Cases Category