Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in ONGC vs. Welspun Specialty Solutions Dispute image for SC Judgment dated 13-11-2021 in the case of Welspun Specialty Solutions Lt vs Oil and Natural Gas Corporatio
| |

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in ONGC vs. Welspun Specialty Solutions Dispute

The Supreme Court of India, in its judgment dated 13 November 2021, upheld an arbitral award in favor of Welspun Specialty Solutions Limited (formerly Remi Metals Gujarat Ltd.) in a contractual dispute with the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC). The case, Welspun Specialty Solutions Ltd. vs. ONGC, revolved around the imposition of liquidated damages and whether time was the essence of the contract.

Background of the Case

The dispute arose from a global tender issued by ONGC for the procurement of seamless steel casing pipes. Welspun, formerly known as Remi Metals, secured the contract and received four purchase orders (POs). The contract stipulated that delivery should begin within 16 weeks and be completed within 40 weeks from the issuance of the purchase orders.

However, there were delays in supply, leading ONGC to impose liquidated damages amounting to USD 8,07,804.03 and INR 1,05,367. Remi Metals challenged these deductions, arguing that time was not the essence of the contract and that ONGC had extended the delivery timeline multiple times.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/arbitration-award-cannot-be-enforced-if-it-violates-fundamental-policy-of-indian-law-supreme-court-ruling/

Key Issues Before the Court

  • Whether time was the essence of the contract.
  • Whether ONGC was justified in recovering liquidated damages.
  • Whether the supplier was entitled to an extension of the delivery period without penalty due to force majeure conditions.
  • Whether the arbitral award should be upheld or set aside.

Petitioner’s Arguments (Welspun Specialty Solutions Ltd.)

Welspun, through its counsel, contended:

  • The contract allowed for extensions, indicating that time was not the essence of the contract.
  • Since ONGC had waived liquidated damages in prior extensions, it could not impose them later.
  • The arbitral tribunal had correctly determined that ONGC could recover only actual losses, not pre-estimated liquidated damages.
  • The High Court’s interference with the arbitral award was unjustified and contrary to established precedents.

Respondent’s Arguments (ONGC)

ONGC, represented by its counsel, argued:

  • The contract explicitly mentioned that time was of the essence.
  • Liquidated damages were a genuine pre-estimate of loss agreed upon in the contract.
  • The arbitral tribunal erred in distinguishing this case from ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003), which upheld the imposition of liquidated damages.
  • The High Court was justified in setting aside the arbitral award.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Chief Justice N.V. Ramana and Justice Surya Kant, analyzed the arbitral award and concluded:

  • The presence of extension clauses in the contract indicated that time was not the essence of the contract.
  • ONGC had waived liquidated damages in previous extensions, making their later imposition inconsistent.
  • The arbitral tribunal’s decision to award damages based on actual losses instead of liquidated damages was reasonable.
  • The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act by re-evaluating the merits of the award.

Key Supreme Court Rulings Cited

The Court referred to several landmark judgments, including:

  • ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003) – Establishing that liquidated damages can be imposed if they represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
  • Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority (2015) – Reinforcing the principle that courts should not interfere with arbitral awards unless they are perverse.
  • Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem (2021) – Emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Welspun, issuing the following directives:

  • The High Court’s order setting aside the arbitral award was quashed.
  • The arbitral award, which granted damages based on actual losses instead of liquidated damages, was upheld.
  • ONGC’s appeal was dismissed.
  • Both parties were directed to bear their own costs.

Implications of the Judgment

The Supreme Court’s ruling has significant implications for commercial contracts and arbitration in India:

  • Reaffirmation of Arbitral Finality: The judgment reinforces that arbitral awards should not be lightly interfered with by courts.
  • Clarification on Liquidated Damages: The decision highlights that liquidated damages cannot be imposed if a party has waived them in prior contract extensions.
  • Limits on Judicial Review: The ruling affirms that courts cannot re-evaluate evidence or substitute their findings for those of an arbitrator.
  • Stronger Protection for Contractors: The decision protects contractors from arbitrary imposition of liquidated damages when actual losses can be determined.

The Supreme Court’s judgment in Welspun Specialty Solutions Ltd. vs. ONGC sets a strong precedent for contractual interpretation and arbitration, ensuring that commercial agreements are enforced fairly and consistently.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-quashes-arbitration-award-in-chhattisgarh-supervision-charges-dispute/


Petitioner Name: Welspun Specialty Solutions Ltd..
Respondent Name: Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd..
Judgment By: Justice N.V. Ramana, Justice Surya Kant.
Place Of Incident: Uttarakhand.
Judgment Date: 13-11-2021.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: welspun-specialty-so-vs-oil-and-natural-gas-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-13-11-2021.pdf

Directly Download Judgment: Directly download this Judgment

See all petitions in Arbitration Awards
See all petitions in Commercial Arbitration
See all petitions in Enforcement of Awards
See all petitions in Judgment by N.V. Ramana
See all petitions in Judgment by Surya Kant
See all petitions in allowed
See all petitions in Quashed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments November 2021
See all petitions in 2021 judgments

See all posts in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category
See all allowed petitions in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category

Similar Posts