Featured image for Supreme Court Judgment dated 02-07-2018 in case of petitioner name M/S. New Okhla Industrial Deve vs Commissioner of Income Tax – A
| |

Supreme Court Rules on TDS Deduction for Noida and Greater Noida Authorities

The Supreme Court of India, in M/S. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Commissioner of Income Tax – Appeals & Ors., delivered a significant ruling addressing the tax deduction at source (TDS) applicability on lease rent payments to Noida and Greater Noida authorities. The ruling clarified that these authorities do not qualify as ‘local authorities’ under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore are not exempt from TDS on rental income.

Background of the Case

The dispute arose when several entities, including real estate developers and banks, entered into long-term lease agreements with the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) and Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) for land and infrastructure development. These authorities, constituted under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, claimed that they were ‘local authorities’ and thus exempt from income tax under Section 10(20).

Relying on this claim, they advised their tenants and lessees not to deduct TDS on payments made to them. However, the Income Tax Department argued that the 2002 amendment to Section 10(20) removed their exemption status, making them liable for TDS on rental income. The dispute escalated to the Delhi High Court and eventually reached the Supreme Court.

Key Legal Issues

  • Whether NOIDA and GNIDA qualify as ‘local authorities’ under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act.
  • Whether lease rental payments made to these authorities are subject to TDS under Section 194-I.
  • Whether entities failing to deduct TDS should be held as ‘assessees in default.’

Petitioner’s Arguments

The NOIDA and GNIDA authorities contended:

  • They were created under a state statute and exercised municipal functions, qualifying them as ‘local authorities’ under the Income Tax Act.
  • Rental income received from lease agreements was part of their statutory functioning and should be exempt from taxation.
  • The government’s notification and past practices recognized them as exempt from TDS obligations.

Respondent’s Arguments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) argued:

  • The Finance Act, 2002, specifically removed NOIDA and GNIDA from the definition of ‘local authority.’
  • Rental income from lease agreements was taxable, and lessees were required to deduct TDS under Section 194-I.
  • Entities failing to deduct TDS should be held accountable and liable for penalties.

Delhi High Court’s Decision

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the tax department, holding that NOIDA and GNIDA:

  • Were not ‘local authorities’ under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act.
  • Could claim exemption for interest income under a separate notification, but not for rental income.
  • Had wrongly advised lessees against deducting TDS, making them liable for tax penalties.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision and analyzed the statutory framework surrounding tax exemptions. The Court stated:

“The 2002 amendment to Section 10(20) specifically excluded authorities like NOIDA and GNIDA from the definition of ‘local authority.’ They are statutory bodies but do not exercise sovereign municipal functions.”

The Court further clarified the application of TDS:

“Section 194-I applies to payments made for use of land, buildings, or other immovable properties. The term ‘rent’ as defined under the Act clearly includes lease payments made to NOIDA and GNIDA, making them subject to TDS.”

Implications of the Judgment

The judgment carries significant implications for both taxpayers and government authorities:

  • Entities making rental payments to NOIDA and GNIDA must deduct TDS under Section 194-I.
  • Non-compliance with TDS obligations will result in penalties and potential legal action.
  • Other statutory bodies claiming tax exemption must carefully evaluate their status under the amended provisions of Section 10(20).

Final Judgment and Conclusion

The Supreme Court ruled:

  • NOIDA and GNIDA are not ‘local authorities’ under Section 10(20) and cannot claim income tax exemption.
  • Lessees and financial institutions must deduct TDS on lease rent payments made to these authorities.
  • Entities failing to deduct TDS will be treated as ‘assessees in default’ and liable for penalties.

This judgment reinforces the need for strict compliance with tax regulations and provides clarity on the taxation status of urban development authorities. By establishing that NOIDA and GNIDA do not enjoy automatic tax exemption, the ruling ensures consistency in tax administration and accountability in revenue collection.


Petitioner Name: M/S. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority.
Respondent Name: Commissioner of Income Tax – Appeals & Ors..
Judgment By: Justice A.K. Sikri, Justice Ashok Bhushan.
Place Of Incident: Delhi, India.
Judgment Date: 02-07-2018.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: MS. New Okhla Indus vs Commissioner of Inco Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 02-07-2018.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Income Tax Disputes
See all petitions in Tax Evasion Cases
See all petitions in Banking Regulations
See all petitions in Judgment by A.K. Sikri
See all petitions in Judgment by Ashok Bhushan
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in Declared Infructuous
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments July 2018
See all petitions in 2018 judgments

See all posts in Taxation and Financial Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Taxation and Financial Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Taxation and Financial Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Taxation and Financial Cases Category

Similar Posts