Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Child Rape Case, Rejects High Court Acquittal

The case of State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Sanjay Kumar @ Sunny brought forth a critical legal issue regarding child sexual abuse and the importance of a victim’s testimony. Initially, the trial court convicted the accused under Sections 376(2)(f) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). However, the High Court overturned the conviction, citing delays in reporting and inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case. The Supreme Court reinstated the conviction, stressing the credibility of the victim’s statement and the need for a sensitive approach in cases of child sexual abuse.

Case Background

The victim, a nine-year-old girl, was raped multiple times by her paternal uncle during visits to her grandparents’ house. Due to fear and threats from the accused, she did not disclose the abuse immediately. The crime came to light only when she developed severe stomach pain, leading to a medical examination that confirmed sexual assault. An FIR was subsequently filed, and legal proceedings commenced.

Prosecution’s Case

• The victim provided a consistent account of the incidents, which was supported by medical evidence.
• Her mother (PW-1) confirmed that the child suffered prolonged stomach issues and eventually disclosed the abuse.
• The forensic examination revealed that the victim had suffered extensive physical trauma, consistent with repeated sexual assault.
• The delay in reporting was due to threats from the accused, which is common in child sexual abuse cases.

Defense’s Arguments

• The High Court found inconsistencies in the victim’s statements, arguing that her testimony lacked credibility.
• It was contended that in a joint family with 20-25 members, such incidents could not have taken place unnoticed.
• The defense claimed that the allegations stemmed from a family property dispute and were fabricated.

Supreme Court’s Judgment

The Supreme Court critically examined the High Court’s reasoning and found it flawed. The Court noted:

“In cases of incestuous abuse, more often, silence is built into the abuse. Delay in reporting cannot be used as a reason to dismiss the victim’s testimony, especially when corroborated by medical evidence.”

The Court provided the following observations:

• The victim’s testimony was credible and consistent with medical findings.
• The delay in reporting was justified, given the threats and fear instilled in the child.
• Child victims often do not immediately disclose abuse due to psychological trauma and fear of family repercussions.
• The presence of family members does not eliminate the possibility of abuse, especially in a household where the accused held a position of authority over the victim.
• The High Court’s focus on peripheral inconsistencies ignored the core evidence that established the crime.

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court reinstated the trial court’s decision, sentencing the accused to:

• 12 years of rigorous imprisonment under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.
• 2 years of rigorous imprisonment under Section 506 IPC.
• A fine of Rs. 50,000, failing which the accused would serve an additional year of imprisonment.

The Court directed that the accused be taken into custody immediately to serve his remaining sentence.

Conclusion

The judgment underscores the importance of treating child sexual abuse cases with sensitivity and ensuring that procedural delays do not become a reason for denying justice. The Supreme Court’s ruling reaffirms that the testimony of child victims, when credible and supported by medical evidence, must be given due weight in legal proceedings.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: State of Himachal Pr vs Sanjay Kumar @ Sunny Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 15-12-2016.pdf