Featured image for Supreme Court Judgment dated 18-05-2018 in case of petitioner name Rama Nath Jha vs Union of India
| |

Supreme Court Remands Railway Promotion Dispute Back to High Court for Fresh Consideration

The case of Rama Nath Jha vs. Union of India is a significant ruling by the Supreme Court of India, dealing with a railway employee’s promotion dispute. The appellant, Rama Nath Jha, had approached the Supreme Court challenging a judgment by the High Court of Judicature at Patna, which dismissed his petition without addressing the core issues raised by him.

Background of the Case

The dispute originated when Rama Nath Jha, an employee in the Indian Railways, was promoted to the position of Passenger Guard. He contended that his promotion was based on a proper selection process, but subsequent legal challenges questioned its validity. The case was first heard by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Patna Bench, which passed an order on December 14, 2012, in OA No. 42 of 2005 and other connected matters. The Tribunal’s decision was unfavorable to the appellant, prompting him to approach the Patna High Court.

The High Court dismissed his petition in Writ Petition (C) No. 3548 of 2017, stating that it was unwilling to interfere with the CAT’s ruling since the matter had already been adjudicated through various rounds of legal battles, including before the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court. However, the High Court did not examine the specific grievances raised by the appellant.

Arguments by the Petitioner (Rama Nath Jha)

The petitioner presented the following arguments:

  • Denial of Due Consideration: The High Court did not address the specific contentions raised by him regarding his promotion and its legitimacy.
  • Violation of Natural Justice: He was not made a party to earlier proceedings that influenced the Tribunal’s decision.
  • Need for Individual Grievance Redressal: The CAT’s ruling was based on general policy decisions rather than the specific facts of his case.

Arguments by the Respondent (Union of India)

The Union of India defended the CAT and High Court decisions, stating:

  • Finality of Earlier Proceedings: The matter had already been litigated in other courts, including the Supreme Court.
  • Policy-Based Decision: The Tribunal’s ruling was aligned with railway promotion policies and legal precedents.
  • Adequate Opportunity: The appellant had avenues to raise his grievances before the CAT and High Court.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court, led by Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, examined the case and found that the High Court had failed to engage with the contentions raised by the appellant.

“We do not find that any of the contentions raised by the appellant has been dealt with in the writ appeal judgment. For that only reason, we set aside the impugned judgment and remand the matter to the Division Bench of the High Court to consider the matter afresh and pass a reasoned judgment, adverting to the contentions raised by the appellant.”

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court ruled:

  • The Patna High Court’s judgment was set aside due to its failure to address the appellant’s grievances.
  • The case was remanded to the Division Bench of the High Court for fresh consideration.
  • The High Court was directed to provide a reasoned judgment addressing the appellant’s arguments.
  • The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.

The Court concluded:

“The appeal is disposed of as above. No costs.”


Petitioner Name: Rama Nath Jha.
Respondent Name: Union of India.
Judgment By: Justice Kurian Joseph, Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar.
Place Of Incident: Patna, Bihar.
Judgment Date: 18-05-2018.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Rama Nath Jha vs Union of India Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 18-05-2018.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Employment Disputes
See all petitions in Promotion Cases
See all petitions in Public Sector Employees
See all petitions in Judgment by Kurian Joseph
See all petitions in Judgment by Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
See all petitions in Remanded
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments May 2018
See all petitions in 2018 judgments

See all posts in Service Matters Category
See all allowed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Service Matters Category

Similar Posts