Supreme Court Grants 14% Interest on Arbitration Award to Gokul Lamp Works in Mysore Lamp Dispute

The Supreme Court of India, in its judgment dated February 7, 2025, ruled in favor of M/s. Gokul Lamp Works Private Limited and M/s. Thamaka Lamp Components Private Limited, directing Mysore Lamp Works Limited to pay post-award interest at the rate of 14% per annum on arbitration awards from January 19, 2005, until the full payment is made. The Court overturned the Karnataka High Court’s decision, which had previously set aside the post-award interest awarded by the Arbitral Tribunal.

Background of the Case

The case stems from an arbitration dispute between the appellants, M/s. Gokul Lamp Works and M/s. Thamaka Lamp Components, and the respondent, Mysore Lamp Works Limited. The dispute arose over payments related to business transactions, leading to arbitration proceedings.

The Arbitral Tribunal, in its award dated January 19, 2005, directed Mysore Lamp Works Limited to pay principal amounts along with interest. The appellants received their principal payments and pendente lite interest (interest accruing during the legal proceedings), but the dispute over post-award interest (interest accruing after the award until payment) remained unresolved.

Petitioners’ Arguments (Gokul Lamp Works & Thamaka Lamp Components)

The appellants argued that:

The High Court erred in setting aside the Arbitral Tribunal’s direction on post-award interest.
Under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, post-award interest is an essential component of arbitral awards and cannot be arbitrarily removed.
They had been deprived of the rightful compensation due to the High Court’s decision, which unjustly limited their ability to recover full damages.
The respondent’s delay in making payments had caused financial losses, warranting compensation through interest.

Respondent’s Arguments (Mysore Lamp Works Limited)

The respondent contended:

The company was previously functional but has now been repurposed for public purposes, and the financial burden of additional interest would impact its operations.
The Karnataka High Court had correctly ruled against post-award interest, considering the economic condition of the respondent.
They had already paid the principal amount and pendente lite interest, which sufficiently settled their liability.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court reviewed the matter and ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the importance of post-award interest in arbitration proceedings. The Court held:

“Under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitral award granting post-award interest is binding unless explicitly set aside on valid grounds. The High Court’s interference in the arbitral award was unjustified.”

The Court further noted:

“The right to post-award interest ensures that parties receiving arbitral awards are compensated for the delay in enforcement and do not suffer financial losses due to non-payment.”

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court ruled:

The Karnataka High Court’s judgment dated November 18, 2022, which set aside post-award interest, is quashed.
Mysore Lamp Works Limited shall pay simple interest at the rate of 14% per annum from January 19, 2005, until the full payment is made.
A computation chart shall be provided to the appellants to calculate the amount due.
The payments must be made within ten weeks from the date of judgment.
In case of failure to comply, the Supreme Court reserves the right to revise the interest rate further.

Impact of the Judgment

This ruling has significant implications for arbitration enforcement in India:

Strengthening Arbitral Autonomy: The judgment reinforces the principle that arbitral awards, including post-award interest, must be honored unless challenged on legitimate grounds.
Ensuring Fair Compensation: The ruling protects the rights of businesses to receive fair compensation for delayed payments.
Discouraging Delays in Arbitration Enforcement: The Court’s decision acts as a deterrent against non-compliance with arbitral awards.
Judicial Oversight on Arbitration Awards: The ruling clarifies that High Courts cannot arbitrarily interfere with legally binding arbitral awards.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Gokul Lamp Works vs. Mysore Lamp Works strengthens the enforcement of arbitral awards in India. By reinstating the 14% post-award interest, the judgment ensures that successful claimants in arbitration proceedings are fairly compensated for payment delays. The ruling reaffirms the principle that courts must respect the terms of arbitration awards, promoting trust in India’s arbitration framework.

Petitioner Name: M/s. Gokul Lamp Works Private Limited & Others.
Respondent Name: Mysore Lamp Works Limited.
Judgment By: Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar.
Place Of Incident: Karnataka.
Judgment Date: 07-02-2025.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: ms.-gokul-lamp-work-vs-mysore-lamp-works-li-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-07-02-2025.pdf

Directly Download Judgment: Directly download this Judgment

See all petitions in Arbitration Awards
See all petitions in Enforcement of Awards
See all petitions in Commercial Arbitration
See all petitions in Judgment by Sanjiv Khanna
See all petitions in Judgment by Sanjay Kumar
See all petitions in partially allowed
See all petitions in Modified
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments February 2025
See all petitions in 2025 judgments

See all posts in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category
See all allowed petitions in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Arbitration and Alternate Dispute Resolution Category