Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Shikha Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh

The case of Shikha Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. pertains to a review petition filed by the petitioner, Shikha Jain, seeking reconsideration of the Supreme Court’s decision in Criminal Appeal No. 731 of 2021. The case was primarily centered on a legal dispute, and the petitioner contended that there was an apparent error in the judgment that required intervention. However, after reviewing the petition, the Supreme Court found no grounds for interference and dismissed it.

The ruling reinforces the principle that review petitions cannot be used as an avenue for re-arguing a case unless there is an evident and material error in the judgment. The Supreme Court emphasized that settlements reached in previous proceedings were duly considered while granting relief in the original case.

Background of the Case

The dispute between the petitioner, Shikha Jain, and the State of Uttar Pradesh was previously adjudicated by the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 731 of 2021. The judgment in that case was based on a spirit of settlement that had been reached between the parties.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-dismisses-review-petition-in-criminal-case-of-kiran-devi-vs-ravindra-kumar-yadav/

Following the decision, the petitioner sought a review, arguing that certain critical aspects were overlooked and that the judgment contained errors justifying reconsideration. The review petition was filed under the inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which allows for limited scrutiny of its own judgments.

Arguments by the Petitioner

Shikha Jain, through her legal representatives, argued:

• The Supreme Court’s previous ruling did not fully consider the legal and factual issues raised during the appeal.
• There was an apparent error in the judgment that merited reconsideration.
• The settlement that formed the basis of the decision required further evaluation, as it allegedly did not reflect the true intent of the parties involved.

Arguments by the Respondents

The State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents opposed the review petition, stating:

• The judgment had been delivered after due consideration of all relevant factors.
• No new material facts or errors apparent on the face of the record had been presented to justify a review.
• The Supreme Court’s decision was legally sound and did not warrant reconsideration.

Supreme Court’s Judgment

After reviewing the petition, the Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Uday Umesh Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, ruled:

“We have gone through the grounds taken in Review Petition and do not find any error apparent to justify interference. This Review Petition is dismissed.”

The Court reiterated that review petitions are not meant to function as an appellate mechanism and that judicial decisions can only be reviewed under exceptional circumstances where an error is evident and affects the outcome of the case.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-restores-fir-in-gujarat-land-dispute-case-quashing-order-overturned/

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the review petition in Shikha Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh highlights the restrictive scope of review jurisdiction. The judgment serves as a reminder that review petitions cannot be used to reopen settled legal disputes unless a clear and manifest error is present.

Petitioner Name: Shikha Jain.
Respondent Name: State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr..
Judgment By: Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, Justice Ajay Rastogi.
Place Of Incident: Uttar Pradesh.
Judgment Date: 16-11-2021.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: shikha-jain-vs-state-of-uttar-prade-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-16-11-2021.pdf