Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Criminal Case of Kiran Devi vs. Ravindra Kumar Yadav

The case of Kiran Devi vs. Ravindra Kumar Yadav revolves around a criminal matter in which the petitioner sought a review of a previous Supreme Court order dated July 9, 2021. The petitioner, Smt. Kiran Devi, filed a review petition citing an error in the original order. However, after evaluating the arguments and examining the records, the Supreme Court dismissed the review petition.

The judgment is significant in understanding the limited scope of review petitions under the Indian legal framework. The Supreme Court reiterated that a review petition cannot be used to reargue the case unless there is an apparent error in the judgment.

Background of the Case

The legal battle between Kiran Devi and Ravindra Kumar Yadav had been ongoing, leading to the initial Supreme Court order dated July 9, 2021. The petitioner challenged this order by filing a review petition, seeking reconsideration based on specific legal grounds.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-restores-fir-in-gujarat-land-dispute-case-quashing-order-overturned/

However, the Supreme Court found no substantive grounds to interfere with its previous order and upheld its decision, dismissing the review petition. Additionally, the Court condoned a 17-day delay in filing the petition but ultimately ruled against the petitioner.

Key Arguments by the Petitioner

The petitioner, Kiran Devi, argued that:

• The previous Supreme Court order contained errors that required correction.
• The review petition should be entertained due to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
• The Court had overlooked certain crucial aspects while delivering the original judgment.

Key Arguments by the Respondent

The respondent, Ravindra Kumar Yadav, countered the petitioner’s claims, stating:

• The previous order was legally sound and did not require reconsideration.
• The review petition did not establish any error apparent on record, making it non-maintainable.
• The Supreme Court had already considered all relevant factors before delivering its July 9, 2021 order.

Supreme Court’s Judgment

The Supreme Court, comprising Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, Ajay Rastogi, and Aniruddha Bose, ruled:

“We have gone through the contents in the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed.”

The Court made it clear that unless a glaring error is evident, a review petition cannot be used as a tool to revisit previously settled legal disputes.

Conclusion

This ruling reaffirms the principle that the Supreme Court’s review jurisdiction is highly restrictive. Only in cases where an apparent mistake is found in the judgment can a review petition be entertained. This case serves as a precedent for future litigants, emphasizing the importance of presenting all necessary arguments during the initial hearings rather than relying on a review process for reconsideration.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/ali-ahmad-vs-state-of-bihar-supreme-court-ruling-on-bail-under-section-389-crpc/

Petitioner Name: Smt. Kiran Devi.
Respondent Name: Ravindra Kumar Yadav.
Judgment By: Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, Justice Ajay Rastogi, Justice Aniruddha Bose.
Place Of Incident: New Delhi.
Judgment Date: 16-11-2021.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: smt.-kiran-devi-vs-ravindra-kumar-yadav-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-16-11-2021.pdf