Supreme Court Allows La Residentia to Continue Construction: Landmark Verdict on Homebuyers' Rights

The Supreme Court, in a significant ruling on June 29, 2021, addressed the concerns of homebuyers in the La Residentia project, which had been linked to the Amrapali Group. The case of Bikram Chatterji & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. revolved around alleged financial mismanagement and fund diversion by real estate developers, leaving thousands of homebuyers in distress. This ruling clarified the status of La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd. and provided relief to affected homebuyers while ensuring the completion of stalled projects.

Background of the Case

The case stemmed from the Amrapali Group’s financial fraud, in which funds from homebuyers were allegedly misused for other investments, leaving multiple housing projects incomplete. La Residentia, a residential project in Greater Noida, was initially marketed under the Amrapali brand, leading to confusion regarding its legal and financial connection to the group.

After forensic audits revealed that certain funds from Amrapali were linked to La Residentia, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether La Residentia should also be taken over by the court-appointed National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC), as was done with other Amrapali projects.

Key Legal Issues

Whether La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd. should be treated as an Amrapali Group entity.
Whether the stalled construction of La Residentia should be handed over to NBCC.
Whether La Residentia should be liable for financial dues and penalties imposed on Amrapali projects.
The rights of homebuyers who had invested in the La Residentia project.

Arguments of the Petitioners (Homebuyers)

The petitioners, led by the Amrapali La Residentia Flat Buyers Association, contended that:

La Residentia was extensively marketed as an Amrapali project, misleading homebuyers into believing it was part of the group.
Funds from homebuyers were allegedly diverted by Amrapali directors, and the project should be considered part of Amrapali’s financial irregularities.
La Residentia’s incomplete status justified its takeover by NBCC, ensuring fair and timely completion.
Homebuyers should be compensated for delays and the financial burden imposed due to stalled construction.

Arguments of the Respondents (La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd.)

La Residentia, defending its position, argued that:

The project was not part of Amrapali Group but was independently managed.
Though Amrapali’s marketing support was used initially, La Residentia had no financial ties to the group beyond minor shareholding.
Out of 3,256 planned flats, more than 1,484 were already completed, and 1,143 homebuyers had taken possession.
The cost of construction incurred by La Residentia was significantly lower than that of NBCC, and transferring the project would lead to unnecessary cost escalation.
The project was already under construction, and homebuyers’ best interests would be served by allowing La Residentia to continue construction rather than transferring it to a third party.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The bench, led by Justices Uday Umesh Lalit and Ashok Bhushan, made the following key observations:

The forensic audit found that La Residentia had financial links with Amrapali, but it was not wholly controlled by the Amrapali Group.
Unlike Amrapali projects, La Residentia was not completely stalled; construction had been ongoing, and a significant number of homebuyers had already taken possession.
Shifting the project to NBCC would result in higher construction costs, burdening homebuyers unnecessarily.
There was no justification to declare La Residentia an Amrapali project, but its financial dealings needed oversight to prevent further discrepancies.

Final Verdict

The Supreme Court ruled that:

La Residentia Developers Pvt. Ltd. would continue construction and complete the remaining flats.
The court receiver would oversee financial transactions to ensure transparency and prevent further fund diversion.
The injunction on the sale of 632 unsold flats in La Residentia was modified, allowing the company to sell them under strict financial supervision.
NBCC would not take over La Residentia, but La Residentia was required to follow a timeline for completion.
Homebuyers’ interests were to be protected by ensuring construction funding and fair pricing.

Impact of the Judgment

This judgment sets an important precedent for real estate cases involving developer-homebuyer disputes. The ruling clarifies:

That partial financial involvement does not automatically make a project part of a fraudulent developer’s operations.
That homebuyers have the right to demand oversight and accountability while ensuring reasonable construction costs.
That State intervention must be balanced with allowing private developers to fulfill obligations if they demonstrate ongoing construction.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Bikram Chatterji & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. is a significant ruling that protects homebuyers’ rights while ensuring continued construction of La Residentia. By permitting the developer to proceed under financial supervision rather than transferring the project to NBCC, the Court ensured that costs remained controlled while prioritizing homebuyers’ interests.

The petition was partially allowed, with modifications to previous injunctions, ensuring fair treatment of homebuyers and oversight on financial dealings.

Petitioner Name: Bikram Chatterji & Ors..
Respondent Name: Union of India & Ors..
Judgment By: Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, Justice Ashok Bhushan.
Place Of Incident: Greater Noida.
Judgment Date: 29-06-2021.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: bikram-chatterji-&-o-vs-union-of-india-&-ors-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-29-06-2021.pdf

Directly Download Judgment: Directly download this Judgment

See all petitions in Property Disputes
See all petitions in Consumer Rights
See all petitions in Damages and Compensation
See all petitions in Judgment by Uday Umesh Lalit
See all petitions in Judgment by Ashok Bhushan
See all petitions in partially allowed
See all petitions in Modified
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments June 2021
See all petitions in 2021 judgments

See all posts in Civil Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Civil Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Civil Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Civil Cases Category