Star Sports vs. Prasar Bharati: Supreme Court Rules on Mandatory Sharing of Sports Broadcast Signals

The case of Star Sports India Private Limited vs. Prasar Bharati & Ors. is a landmark ruling concerning the sharing of sports broadcasting signals. The Supreme Court had to determine whether sports broadcasters like Star Sports were required to remove commercial elements from the live feed before sharing it with Prasar Bharati, the state-run broadcaster. The judgment, delivered on May 27, 2016, upheld the view that broadcasters must ensure that the signals shared with Prasar Bharati are free from commercial advertisements.

Background of the Case

The dispute arose from the obligations imposed by the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “Sports Act”). Section 3 of the Act mandates that private broadcasters must share live sports broadcasts of events of national importance with Prasar Bharati without advertisements.

Star Sports India Private Limited, the appellant, contested the interpretation of this law, arguing that it was only required to remove advertisements inserted by itself, not those placed by the event organizer (such as the International Cricket Council (ICC) or Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)). Prasar Bharati, however, contended that all commercial content, including sponsor logos and on-screen credits, must be removed.

Legal Issues Raised

The case revolved around the following key questions:

What constitutes “advertisements” under Section 3 of the Sports Act?
Whether the obligation to remove advertisements applies only to the broadcaster or also to the advertisements embedded by the event organizer?
Whether Star Sports had the ability and responsibility to remove sponsor logos and commercial elements from the world feed?

Arguments of the Petitioner (Star Sports)

Star Sports, represented by senior counsel, argued that:

Under the Sports Act, the obligation is limited to removing advertisements inserted by the broadcaster, not those embedded by the event organizer.
The world feed, provided by event organizers like the ICC, contains built-in graphics such as ball speed, scoreboards, and player statistics, which may include logos of event sponsors.
These on-screen sponsor logos are an inherent part of the broadcast and cannot be removed without significant alteration to the feed.
Requiring Star Sports to provide a “clean feed” would impose a technical and financial burden not contemplated by the legislation.

Arguments of the Respondent (Prasar Bharati)

Prasar Bharati, represented by the Attorney General, countered:

Section 3 of the Sports Act clearly states that the live feed must be shared “without its advertisements.”
The term “its advertisements” applies broadly to include any advertisements present in the broadcast, regardless of whether they were inserted by the broadcaster or the event organizer.
Prasar Bharati must be provided with a clean feed because any commercial elements would undermine the purpose of the Act, which is to ensure free public access to sports events without commercial influence.
Since Prasar Bharati does not earn revenue from these advertisements, allowing them to be included would give undue commercial advantage to private broadcasters.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court examined the provisions of the Sports Act and found that:

The purpose of the Act is to provide the widest possible access to sports broadcasts on a free-to-air basis.
The phrase “without its advertisements” must be interpreted in a manner that ensures a completely ad-free feed to Prasar Bharati.
On-screen credits, sponsor logos, and commercial graphics included in the world feed are, in effect, advertisements.
The broadcaster has a responsibility to ensure that the shared feed is devoid of such elements.

Key Extracts from the Judgment

The Court stated:

“The sharing of the signals has to be without any advertisements, and if the advertisements are also to be included in the signals, there has to be sharing of the revenue. The term ‘its advertisements’ does not apply only to advertisements inserted by the broadcaster but extends to all commercial elements present in the broadcast.”

The judgment further clarified that:

“The purpose of Section 3 is to provide a clean feed to Prasar Bharati, ensuring that sporting events of national importance reach the public without commercial influence. This objective would be defeated if sponsor logos and on-screen credits remained.”

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court dismissed Star Sports’ appeal and upheld the High Court’s ruling in favor of Prasar Bharati. The key directives were:

Private broadcasters must provide a clean feed to Prasar Bharati, free from any commercial elements.
All on-screen sponsor logos and credits embedded in the world feed must be removed before sharing.
The ruling reinforced the obligation of broadcasters to comply strictly with the provisions of the Sports Act.

Impact of the Judgment

This ruling has significant implications for sports broadcasting in India:

It clarifies the obligations of private broadcasters under the Sports Act.
It ensures that Prasar Bharati receives a commercial-free feed, preserving the integrity of free public broadcasting.
It prevents private broadcasters from benefiting commercially from a larger audience reach on Prasar Bharati’s platforms.
It may influence future contracts between broadcasters and sports event organizers regarding commercial insertions in live feeds.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Star Sports vs. Prasar Bharati reinforces the importance of free-to-air sports broadcasting for the general public. It ensures that sports of national importance are accessible without commercial interruptions, aligning with the intent of the Sports Act. The ruling provides clarity on the responsibilities of broadcasters and sets a precedent for future disputes regarding sports broadcasting rights in India.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Star Sports India Pr vs Prasar Bharati & Ors Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 27-05-2016-1741860978060.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Corporate Compliance
See all petitions in Judgment by A.K. Sikri
See all petitions in Judgment by Prafulla C. Pant
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments May 2016
See all petitions in 2016 judgments

See all posts in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category