SC Dismisses Volkswagen’s Plea to Quash FIR in Emissions Scandal
The Supreme Court of India ruled against Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited in its plea to quash an FIR registered in Uttar Pradesh in connection with the global emissions scandal involving the use of ‘defeat devices’ in diesel vehicles. The case raises significant legal questions about corporate accountability, environmental protection, and consumer rights.
Background of the Case
The case originates from allegations that Volkswagen, a German automobile giant, installed ‘defeat devices’ in its diesel vehicles to manipulate emissions test results. These devices enabled the cars to pass laboratory emissions tests while emitting significantly higher levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) under real-world driving conditions.
The controversy, commonly known as ‘Dieselgate,’ led to legal actions worldwide, including in India. The Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) issued a notice to Volkswagen in November 2015, questioning the compliance of their diesel vehicles with the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989.
In 2018, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) directed Volkswagen to pay Rs. 500 crore in damages for environmental violations. The NGT’s findings became the basis for multiple complaints, including the FIR registered in Uttar Pradesh by a consumer who claimed that he had been misled about the vehicle’s compliance with emission norms.
Arguments by the Petitioner (Volkswagen)
Volkswagen sought to quash the FIR, arguing the following:
- The allegations in the FIR were based on the NGT’s findings, which were already under appeal before the Supreme Court.
- The company had already deposited Rs. 100 crore with the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) as per NGT’s interim order.
- The complaint was filed years after the vehicles were purchased, raising questions about its credibility.
- The issue was primarily an environmental regulatory matter, not a criminal offense warranting police investigation.
Arguments by the Respondents
The State of Uttar Pradesh and the complainant opposed the plea, stating:
- The company had made false representations regarding the emission compliance of its vehicles.
- The use of ‘defeat devices’ was a fraudulent act, deceiving consumers and causing environmental damage.
- The police were well within their rights to investigate the complaint under Sections 420 (cheating), 467, 468, 471 (forgery), and 34 (common intention) of the IPC.
Supreme Court’s Observations
The Supreme Court, while dismissing Volkswagen’s plea, made several critical observations:
1. Corporate Liability and Consumer Deception
The Court reaffirmed that misleading consumers about product compliance with regulatory standards constitutes an offense under criminal law.
“If the petitioner takes a defense that no such devices were installed in the cars sold to the complainant, or that no misrepresentation was made, it is a matter of fact that must be determined during investigation and trial.”
2. Environmental Accountability
The Court cited India’s stringent environmental laws and noted that regulatory compliance cannot be circumvented through deceptive practices.
“The very purpose of emissions regulations is to ensure public health and environmental safety. Any attempt to bypass these norms undermines this objective.”
3. No Grounds for Quashing the FIR
The Court ruled that the FIR disclosed sufficient grounds for investigation. It emphasized that courts should rarely interfere at the stage of FIR registration unless the allegations are prima facie baseless.
“An FIR should only be quashed in the rarest of rare cases. The present complaint discloses allegations that merit a thorough investigation.”
4. Interim Protection Against Arrest
While rejecting Volkswagen’s plea to quash the FIR, the Court upheld the Allahabad High Court’s interim order, protecting company officials from arrest until the police completed their investigation.
Final Judgment
The Supreme Court dismissed Volkswagen’s special leave petition, allowing the police investigation to proceed. However, it ensured that company officials would not be arrested until the police filed their final report under Section 173(2) of the CrPC.
Conclusion
This ruling is a significant step in ensuring corporate accountability and environmental protection in India. It establishes that automobile manufacturers must comply with emission norms transparently and cannot mislead consumers. The decision also reinforces the principle that FIRs should not be quashed prematurely when substantive allegations exist. As the case moves forward, it will be closely watched for its implications on consumer rights, environmental regulation, and corporate ethics in India’s automobile industry.
Petitioner Name: Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited.Respondent Name: State of Uttar Pradesh & Others.Judgment By: Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice A.S. Bopanna, Justice V. Ramasubramanian.Place Of Incident: Uttar Pradesh, India.Judgment Date: 26-11-2020.
Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!
Download Judgment: Skoda Auto Volkswage vs State of Uttar Prade Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 26-11-2020.pdf
Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment
See all petitions in Fraud and Forgery
See all petitions in unfair trade practices
See all petitions in Environmental Cases
See all petitions in Judgment by S. A. Bobde
See all petitions in Judgment by A. S. Bopanna
See all petitions in Judgment by V. Ramasubramanian
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments November 2020
See all petitions in 2020 judgments
See all posts in Criminal Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Criminal Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Criminal Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Criminal Cases Category
