Review Petition Dismissed Due to Delay: Deependra Singh Rathore vs Union of India

The Supreme Court of India recently ruled on the case of Deependra Singh Rathore vs Union of India, where the petitioner sought a review of a previous decision. However, the Court dismissed the review petition on the ground of limitation, citing a delay of 337 days in filing the petition.

The case originated from a Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 28312 of 2019, where the petitioner had challenged an earlier decision. The review petition, which was filed much later, was deemed to have been submitted beyond the permissible time frame, and the explanation provided for the delay was found to be unsatisfactory.

Key Issue: Delay in Filing the Review Petition

The Supreme Court strictly adheres to procedural limitations, especially regarding review petitions. The petitioner, Deependra Singh Rathore, had delayed the filing of the petition by 337 days, and the Court was not convinced by the reasons provided for the delay.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/specific-performance-of-property-sale-supreme-court-upholds-buyers-rights-against-sellers-objections/

Petitioner’s Arguments

Deependra Singh Rathore contended that:

• The delay was due to unforeseen circumstances that prevented the timely filing of the review petition.
• The case held significant legal importance and deserved reconsideration despite the delay.

Respondent’s Arguments (Union of India)

The Union of India argued that:

• Legal timelines must be strictly adhered to for fairness and efficiency in the judicial process.
• The petitioner failed to provide a compelling reason for the excessive delay.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

The bench, comprising Justices Uday Umesh Lalit and Vineet Saran, ruled:

“There is a delay of 337 days in preferring the review petition. The explanation offered in the application seeking condonation of delay is not satisfactory. We, therefore, refuse to condone the delay. Consequently, the review petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation.”

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/municipal-contract-dispute-supreme-court-rules-on-work-order-cancellation/

Implications of the Ruling

This ruling reinforces the Court’s stance on strict adherence to procedural timelines. While review petitions serve as a mechanism for reconsideration, they must be filed within the prescribed time limits unless exceptional circumstances justify the delay.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case highlights the importance of timely legal action. The dismissal of the review petition due to delay underscores that procedural requirements cannot be overlooked, even in cases involving significant legal issues.

Petitioner Name: Deependra Singh Rathore.
Respondent Name: Union of India & Others.
Judgment By: Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, Justice Vineet Saran.
Place Of Incident: India.
Judgment Date: 03-03-2022.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: deependra-singh-rath-vs-union-of-india-&-oth-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-03-03-2022.pdf