Maharashtra Criminal Case: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Charge Framing

The Supreme Court of India, in Vishwambarrao Shankarrao Mane vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr., ruled against the appellant’s plea seeking discharge from criminal proceedings. The Court upheld the lower court’s decision, stating that the charges were yet to be framed and that the appellant could raise his contentions at the appropriate stage.

This ruling underscores the principle that a discharge application cannot be entertained prematurely, ensuring that procedural requirements in criminal trials are duly followed.

Background of the Case

The appellant, Vishwambarrao Shankarrao Mane, filed an application for discharge from criminal proceedings, arguing that there was no material evidence to proceed against him. However, the lower courts dismissed his application, leading him to approach the Supreme Court.

The primary issue before the Court was whether the appellant’s discharge plea could be entertained before the framing of charges.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The appellant contended:

• There was insufficient evidence to frame charges against him.
• The case was based on mere allegations without substantial proof.
• Continuing with the trial would cause unnecessary hardship.

Respondent’s Arguments

The State of Maharashtra countered:

• The charges were yet to be framed, and the appellant’s discharge plea was premature.
• The trial court was the appropriate forum for determining whether charges should be dropped.
• The appellant had the right to raise objections at the appropriate stage of the trial.

Supreme Court’s Key Observations

The Supreme Court, while reviewing the case, observed:

“The appellant is aggrieved since his application for discharge has been dismissed. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State, after having gone through the records, submits that the charges are yet to be framed.”

The Court clarified that the appellant could challenge the charges at a later stage and reiterated that interfering at the pre-charge stage was unwarranted.

Final Judgment and Conclusion

The Supreme Court ruled:

• The appellant’s plea for discharge was dismissed.
• He was allowed to raise his objections at the appropriate stage of the trial.
• The pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.

This decision reaffirms the procedural aspect of criminal trials, ensuring that applications for discharge are considered only after charges are framed. It also highlights the importance of allowing trial courts to determine the sufficiency of evidence before higher courts intervene.

Petitioner Name: Vishwambarrao Shankarrao Mane.
Respondent Name: The State of Maharashtra & Anr..
Judgment By: Justice Kurian Joseph, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul.
Place Of Incident: Maharashtra, India.
Judgment Date: 12-07-2018.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Vishwambarrao Shanka vs The State of Maharas Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 12-07-2018.pdf