M.Phil Distance Education Qualification: Supreme Court Upholds Eligibility for Guest Lecturer Posts

The Supreme Court of India, in its judgment on January 25, 2018, ruled on the eligibility of candidates holding M.Phil degrees obtained through distance education before July 11, 2009, for appointment as Guest Lecturers in Madhya Pradesh. The case, State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Manoj Sharma & Ors., revolved around whether such candidates should be considered qualified under University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations. The Court upheld the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s ruling that M.Phil degrees awarded before the enactment of UGC’s 2009 regulations remained valid.

Background of the Case

The case pertains to the recruitment of Guest Lecturers in government and semi-government colleges in Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners, Manoj Sharma and Alok Tripathi, had obtained their M.Phil degrees through distance education between 2007 and 2009, before the UGC issued its new regulations prohibiting such programs from July 11, 2009, onwards.

In 2012, the Madhya Pradesh Higher Education Department issued an order setting eligibility criteria for Guest Lecturers, assigning different weightage to Ph.D., NET/SET, and M.Phil qualifications. However, applications from candidates who had earned their M.Phil through distance education were rejected.

Aggrieved by this decision, the petitioners approached the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which ruled in their favor. The State of Madhya Pradesh challenged this ruling in the Supreme Court.

Arguments by the Appellants (State of Madhya Pradesh)

The State argued that:

The UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for the Award of M.Phil./Ph.D. Degree) Regulations, 2009, explicitly prohibited M.Phil and Ph.D. programs through distance education.
As the petitioners had obtained their M.Phil degrees through distance education, they did not fulfill the eligibility criteria for the posts.
The High Court erred in treating these candidates as eligible, despite the UGC’s prohibition on such degrees.

Arguments by the Respondents (Manoj Sharma & Ors.)

The petitioners countered that:

They had earned their M.Phil degrees before July 11, 2009, when the UGC regulations came into effect.
The UGC regulations were prospective in nature and could not invalidate degrees obtained before their enactment.
The High Court correctly ruled that pre-2009 distance M.Phil degrees remained valid for consideration in government appointments.

Observations of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant regulations and held:

“Regulation 5 of the UGC 2009 Regulations states that no university shall conduct M.Phil and Ph.D. programs through distance education mode after July 11, 2009.”
“However, this restriction is prospective in nature, meaning it does not apply to degrees awarded before the regulation’s enactment.”
“Regulation 3 explicitly states that the new rules shall come into force from the date of publication in the Gazette of India, confirming their non-retrospective nature.”
“The High Court rightly held that degrees obtained before the 2009 regulation could not be invalidated.”

The Court also noted that on the same day, another set of UGC regulations—UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment and Career Advancement of Teachers) (3rd Amendment) Regulations, 2009—was published, which mandated that Ph.D. degree holders, post-2009, must have obtained their degrees in compliance with the new regulations to be exempted from NET/SLET requirements.

Final Verdict

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court’s decision. However, it directed authorities to consider the petitioners’ eligibility in accordance with both the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure) Regulations, 2009, and the UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment) Regulations, 2009.

The Court ruled that:

The High Court’s judgment allowing the petitioners to be considered for the Guest Lecturer posts based on their M.Phil degrees was correct.
The petitioners’ eligibility should still be assessed under the applicable qualification requirements at the time of their application.
The authorities should take into account both sets of 2009 UGC regulations while making their final determination.

Conclusion

This ruling clarifies that M.Phil degrees obtained through distance education before July 11, 2009, remain valid for employment purposes. The decision safeguards the interests of candidates who pursued their degrees before the regulatory change while ensuring compliance with updated academic standards for future applicants.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: State of Madhya Prad vs Manoj Sharma & Ors. Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 25-01-2018.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Recruitment Policies
See all petitions in Education Related Cases
See all petitions in Judgment by A.K. Sikri
See all petitions in Judgment by Ashok Bhushan
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments January 2018
See all petitions in 2018 judgments

See all posts in Service Matters Category
See all allowed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Service Matters Category