Loan Insurance Claim Dispute: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Widow
The case of Ashatai w/o Anand Duparte vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. revolves around a widow’s struggle to claim insurance coverage for a loan taken by her deceased husband. The Supreme Court, in this case, ruled in favor of the appellant, highlighting the responsibility of financial institutions in ensuring proper execution of insurance policies linked to loans.
Background of the Case
The appellant’s husband, Late Anand Duparte, obtained a personal loan of Rs. 2,00,000 from Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. on 27.02.2015. The loan was secured through an insurance policy issued by Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., a sister concern of the respondent finance company.
The insurance policy was a Group Insurance Policy, covering multiple borrowers, with the deceased being listed at Serial No. 263. The policy was set to cover the period from 30.03.2015 to 29.03.2016. However, before the policy came into effect, the borrower suddenly passed away on 17.03.2015, within just 18 days of obtaining the loan.
Following her husband’s demise, the appellant requested the finance company to recover the outstanding loan amount through the insurance policy. However, the respondent refused, contending that no valid insurance coverage was in place at the time of death. The dispute escalated to consumer forums, with the appellant challenging the rejection of the claim.
Arguments by the Petitioner
The appellant, Ashatai w/o Anand Duparte, presented the following arguments:
- The finance company was responsible for ensuring that the insurance coverage was active from the date of loan disbursement.
- The insurance premium was deducted from the loan amount, and the borrower had fulfilled his obligations.
- The respondent finance company was negligent in forwarding the insurance premium on time, leading to a lapse in coverage at the time of the borrower’s death.
- The company’s refusal to honor the insurance policy amounted to deficiency of service and unjust enrichment.
Arguments by the Respondent
The finance company, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., defended its stance by arguing:
- The loan was disbursed on 27.02.2015, but the insurance policy only commenced on 30.03.2015, meaning that the borrower was not covered at the time of his death.
- The appellant failed to provide any evidence proving that the insurance premium was deducted from the loan account.
- The responsibility of insurance activation lay with the insurance company, not the finance company.
- The rejection of the insurance claim was in accordance with the policy terms, and there was no deficiency of service on their part.
Consumer Court Decisions
The case was initially heard by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nanded, which ruled in favor of the appellant, stating:
“Since the loan amount was disbursed, and the insurance premium was deducted, the insurance policy should have been activated immediately. The finance company was negligent in delaying the activation.”
The District Forum ordered the finance company not to recover the outstanding loan amount from the appellant and awarded compensation.
The finance company then appealed to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai, which upheld the District Forum’s order, reaffirming that the delay in insurance activation was the fault of the finance company.
Unhappy with the verdict, the finance company filed a revision petition before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which reversed the previous rulings, stating that there was no proof of the insurance premium being deducted from the loan.
Supreme Court’s Observations
The Supreme Court reviewed the case and found that the National Commission had overlooked critical facts:
“The finance company, in its own admission, had received the insurance premium from the borrower. There was a clear lapse in ensuring that the policy took effect from the date of loan disbursement.”
The Court emphasized that it was the finance company’s duty to coordinate with its sister concern for timely insurance activation. The finance company’s failure to do so led to wrongful rejection of the claim, causing financial hardship to the widow.
Final Judgment
The Supreme Court set aside the National Commission’s order and ruled in favor of the appellant. The Court ordered:
- The finance company shall not recover any amount from the appellant towards the outstanding loan.
- Compensation of Rs. 50,000 shall be paid to the appellant for the inconvenience caused.
- Litigation costs of Rs. 25,000 shall also be awarded.
As a result, the petition was allowed, and the appellant was relieved of her loan liability.
Significance of the Judgment
This case sets a crucial precedent in consumer law, particularly in the area of loan-linked insurance policies. The judgment reinforces that financial institutions must ensure timely activation of insurance policies and cannot shift the burden onto borrowers or their families in case of disputes.
Petitioner Name: Ashatai w/o Anand Duparte.Respondent Name: Shriram City Union Finance Ltd..Judgment By: Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, Justice Indu Malhotra.Place Of Incident: Nanded, Maharashtra.Judgment Date: 16-04-2019.
Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!
Download Judgment: Ashatai wo Anand Du vs Shriram City Union F Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 16-04-2019.pdf
Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment
See all petitions in Life Insurance Claims
See all petitions in Insurance Settlements
See all petitions in Health Insurance Disputes
See all petitions in Judgment by Uday Umesh Lalit
See all petitions in Judgment by Indu Malhotra
See all petitions in allowed
See all petitions in Quashed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments April 2019
See all petitions in 2019 judgments
See all posts in Insurance Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Insurance Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Insurance Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Insurance Cases Category
