Legal Implications of Section 80 C.P.C. Notice Requirement in Civil Suits: Sant Prasad vs. Kausla Nand Sinha

The appeal at hand pertains to a dispute involving the requirement of a notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) before instituting a suit. The appellant, Sant Prasad, filed this appeal after the High Court concluded that a notice under Section 80 C.P.C. is necessary before instituting a suit. However, the High Court failed to consider that the State was already impleaded as a party in the matter without objection at the relevant time. This oversight led to the appellant approaching the Supreme Court.

The main legal issue in the case was whether the notice under Section 80 C.P.C. was required for the suit to proceed. The general principle of law asserts that for a suit against the government or public officers, notice must be issued under Section 80. However, in this case, the fact that the State had been impleaded without objection significantly impacted the outcome.

During the hearing, it was noted that there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. The Supreme Court, recognizing that no further fruitful purpose would be served by retaining the case, chose not to remit the matter back to the High Court. The decision to avoid further litigation was made in the interest of justice. The Court granted the appellant, or anyone claiming through the appellant, the liberty to file an application before the High Court to have the case considered on its merits. The High Court was directed to consider the matter without dismissing it on the grounds of delay.

The Court’s judgment emphasized that although the principle that a notice under Section 80 is required remains valid, in the specific factual circumstances of this case, the failure to issue a notice did not invalidate the suit. As a result, the appeal was disposed of with a direction to the High Court to reconsider the matter on its merits, taking into account the appellant’s application, if filed.

In conclusion, the appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs, and the pending applications, if any, were dismissed. The Supreme Court took a pragmatic approach, ensuring that the matter was not delayed any further while protecting the appellant’s right to a fair hearing.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Sant Prasad vs Kausla Nand Sinha & Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 01-09-2017.pdf