Land Acquisition Compensation and Market Value Determination: Analyzing the Appeal in Sohana and Lakhnaur Land Disputes

This case concerns the appeals filed against the orders passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the compensation awarded for the land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The main issue revolves around the compensation for land acquired in Village Sohana and Village Lakhnaur, both situated in the state of Punjab, in a series of notifications dating from 1981 to 1993. The appellants challenged the determination of compensation by the Reference Court, which awarded Rs. 4 lakhs per acre for land in Village Lakhnaur, relying on an earlier award in the same notification. The appellants argued for higher compensation based on the compensation determined in subsequent land acquisitions in nearby areas, including Village Kambali and Village Sohana.

Petitioner’s Arguments
The appellants, represented by learned counsel Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, argued that the compensation awarded for the land in Village Lakhnaur was too low in comparison to compensation awarded for similar lands in adjoining areas like Village Sohana and Village Kambali. The appellants highlighted that in a previous acquisition in Village Sohana, the Reference Court had awarded compensation of Rs. 5.96 lakhs per acre, and in another case in Village Kambali, the compensation had been Rs. 5.96 lakhs per acre, which had been upheld by the High Court. The appellants contended that the compensation for the land in Village Lakhnaur should be increased accordingly to match the compensation for adjoining villages, given that the land in question had similar potential for development.

The appellants also pointed out that the acquisition in question occurred in 1990, and there had been a significant increase in land prices since the earlier acquisition in 1981. The appellants argued that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court failed to account for the appreciation in land prices, and they requested the Court to award compensation based on the increased market value of the land over the years, taking into account the developments in the area.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/compensation-for-land-acquisition-supreme-court-directs-higher-payout-for-landowners/

Respondent’s Arguments
The respondents, represented by learned counsel for the State, argued that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court was fair and reasonable, considering the circumstances of the case. The respondents emphasized that the land in Village Sohana and Village Lakhnaur was part of the same acquisition notification, and the compensation for both villages should be comparable. They contended that the award of Rs. 4 lakhs per acre for Village Lakhnaur was based on the earlier award made for the same notification, which had been finalized and had attained finality. The respondents argued that the appellants’ request for an increase in compensation based on subsequent acquisitions was unjustified, as the circumstances of the land acquisition had changed over the years.

The respondents also pointed out that the appellants’ argument regarding the proximity of Village Kambali to Village Sohana was irrelevant, as the geographical location of the land and the surrounding infrastructure must be taken into account when determining compensation. They contended that the compensation for land in Village Kambali could not serve as a valid yardstick for determining compensation for Village Sohana or Lakhnaur, as the land in Kambali was located much farther from the urban developments in Sohana and Lakhnaur. The respondents emphasized that the Reference Court had considered the relevant factors and had appropriately determined the compensation amount.

Court’s Analysis and Conclusion
The Supreme Court carefully examined the arguments put forth by both parties and reviewed the factual and legal aspects of the case. The Court considered the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, particularly Section 23, which provides for the determination of compensation based on the market value of the land at the time of acquisition. The Court also considered the fact that the land in question had been acquired through a series of notifications and the differing market values in the relevant time period. The Court noted that while the compensation awarded in earlier acquisitions in Village Sohana and Kambali was higher, it was not appropriate to apply those figures directly to the land in Village Lakhnaur, as the geographical location and the nature of the land were different.

The Court observed that the Reference Court had rightly considered the market value of land in the same notification and had awarded compensation accordingly. The Court also found that the compensation awarded for land in Village Lakhnaur was fair, given that the land was located in an area with less potential for development compared to adjoining areas like Sohana and Kambali. The Court noted that the land in Village Sohana had been subject to several acquisitions, and the compensation for those lands had been increased based on market developments over the years, but this could not be directly applied to the land in Lakhnaur.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-rules-on-land-allotment-dispute-between-noida-authority-and-promotional-club/

The Court also acknowledged that the appellants’ argument for an increase in compensation based on the appreciation in market value was reasonable, but it noted that the Reference Court had already taken into account the relevant market value at the time of acquisition in 1990. The Court emphasized that while land values may increase over time, compensation should be determined based on the conditions existing at the time of acquisition, rather than speculative increases in value over subsequent years.

Final Decision
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants, upholding the decision of the High Court and the Reference Court. The Court confirmed that the compensation of Rs. 4 lakhs per acre for the land in Village Lakhnaur was fair and reasonable, taking into account the market value of the land at the time of acquisition. The Court rejected the appellants’ arguments for increased compensation based on subsequent acquisitions in nearby areas, emphasizing that the compensation should be determined based on the actual circumstances of the land at the time of acquisition. The appeals were dismissed, and the compensation award was upheld as just and proper.

Petitioner Name: Bhag Singh & Ors..
Respondent Name: Union of India & Anr..
Judgment By: Justice Hemant Gupta, Justice V. Ramasubramanian.
Place Of Incident: Chandigarh.
Judgment Date: 05-05-2022.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: bhag-singh-&-ors.-vs-union-of-india-&-anr-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-05-05-2022.pdf