Honor Killing Case: Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Family Members

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Ram Chander & Ors. v. State of Haryana, upheld the conviction and life imprisonment of multiple family members for the brutal honor killing of a mother and daughter. The case revolved around the murder of Messo and her daughter Raj Bala by their own relatives in Haryana, who opposed Raj Bala’s marriage to a boy from another village.

Background of the Case

The case was initiated following the brutal murder of Messo and her 15-year-old daughter Raj Bala in their village home in Haryana. The prosecution’s case was that the accused—Sohan Lal and his sons, including the appellants Ram Chander, Ranbir, Ram Kumar, and Om Prakash—were opposed to Raj Bala’s arranged marriage and warned her mother, Messo, to cancel the engagement. When she refused, they murdered both mother and daughter, burned their bodies, and disposed of the remains in a canal.

The trial court found all the accused guilty and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the verdict, leading to the present appeal before the Supreme Court.

Arguments by the Appellants

• The accused claimed they were falsely implicated and had no involvement in the crime.
• They argued that there was no direct evidence linking them to the crime, and their conviction was based on circumstantial evidence.
• They contended that the prosecution failed to establish motive and presence at the crime scene.
• They questioned the credibility of the sole eyewitness, Guddi, as she was a close relative of the victims.

Arguments by the Prosecution

• The prosecution argued that the evidence of Guddi (PW-9) was credible and supported by other corroborative material.
• It highlighted the forensic evidence, including the recovery of ashes, bones, and weapons, which pointed to the guilt of the accused.
• The accused had openly threatened Messo and Raj Bala a day before the murder, which established a clear motive.
• The manner in which the bodies were disposed of showed premeditation and an attempt to destroy evidence.

Key Observations by the Supreme Court

• The Court noted that both the trial court and the High Court had meticulously examined the evidence and found no inconsistencies in the testimony of the eyewitness, Guddi.
• It held that the presence of bloodstains, burnt remains, and other forensic material corroborated the prosecution’s case.
• The Court rejected the argument that Guddi’s testimony was unreliable due to her relationship with the victims, emphasizing that close relatives often provide the most credible testimony in such cases.
• The Court dismissed the claim that no independent witnesses were examined, stating that the incident took place at midnight when most villagers were asleep.

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court upheld the life sentences of the appellants, stating:

“The findings of fact by the trial court and the High Court were based on proper appreciation of evidence. The prosecution has successfully established the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The Court ordered that any appellants who were on bail be taken into custody immediately to serve the remainder of their sentence.

Significance of the Judgment

This ruling underscores the judiciary’s commitment to punishing honor killings, a crime that continues to plague Indian society. The judgment reaffirms that:

• Family members cannot take the law into their own hands to prevent marriages they disapprove of.
• Eyewitness testimony from close relatives can be credible if supported by other evidence.
• Destruction of evidence will not absolve accused persons if forensic and circumstantial evidence is strong.
• The judiciary will uphold the dignity and rights of individuals, especially women, against regressive societal norms.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s verdict serves as a strong message against honor killings and reinforces the principle that justice will prevail despite attempts to silence victims and destroy evidence. This judgment stands as a landmark ruling in ensuring justice for victims of familial violence.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Ram Chander & Ors. vs State of Haryana Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 02-01-2017.pdf