Global Steel Settlement: Supreme Court Quashes Legal Proceedings After Debt Repayment

The Supreme Court of India recently ruled on a long-standing financial dispute involving State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. vs. M/s Global Steel Holding Limited & Ors.. This case revolved around financial liabilities, repayment of dues, and the subsequent settlement between the parties. The Court, exercising its powers under Article 136 read with Article 142 of the Constitution of India, quashed all related legal proceedings after being informed that the financial obligations had been satisfied.

Background of the Case

The dispute originated from financial transactions between the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. (STC) and Global Steel Holding Limited (GSHL). As per agreements signed on 15 November 2010 and a subsequent settlement agreement dated 17 May 2012, GSHL was obligated to pay specific amounts to STC.

Due to non-compliance with these agreements, STC initiated legal proceedings against GSHL and its representatives. This led to multiple actions, including a First Information Report (FIR) by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), an Enforcement Directorate investigation, and criminal cases under Sections 420 (cheating) and 409 (criminal breach of trust) of the Indian Penal Code.

The matter escalated, leading to proceedings before various authorities and courts. However, during the hearing before the Supreme Court, both parties informed the Court that the financial liabilities had been settled in full.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd., represented by Senior Advocate D.A. Dave, presented the following key arguments:

• STC had initially pursued legal proceedings due to non-payment of outstanding financial dues under the settlement agreements.
• The entire liability amount of ₹600 crores, payable by the respondents with interest at 8% per annum by 28 February 2019, had been fully paid.
• Since the dues had been settled, STC had no further claim against GSHL or its representatives arising from the agreements.
• Given that all financial liabilities had been discharged, STC requested the Court to quash all pending legal proceedings against GSHL.

Respondent’s Arguments

M/s Global Steel Holding Limited, represented by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, countered:

• The settlement agreements had been honored, and all payments due to STC had been made.
• Since there were no outstanding financial obligations, there was no justification for continuing legal proceedings.
• GSHL sought quashing of all related legal actions, including the FIR, Enforcement Directorate investigations, Look-Out Circulars, and criminal cases pending in the Patiala House Court, New Delhi.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court, considering the submissions from both parties, noted:

“As a consequence, all liabilities under the Settlement Agreement dated 15.11.2010, and Further Settlement Agreement dated 17.05.2012, stand fully satisfied. It is stated on behalf of STC that there is no further claim of the Appellants against the Respondents arising out of the aforesaid Agreements.”

Based on this, the Court exercised its extraordinary powers under Article 136 and Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure complete justice and quashed all pending legal actions against GSHL and its representatives.

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court ordered the quashing of the following legal proceedings:

• The FIR lodged by the CBI bearing R.C. No. 217/2017/A0005/CBI/ACU-VI/AC-II/New Delhi.
• The Enforcement Directorate investigation based on the FIR, registered under ECIR No. – ECIR/03/DZ-I/2017 dated 29 March 2017.
• The Show Cause Notice dated 29 December 2017 issued by the High Commission of India, Passport & Consular Wing, London.
• Any Look-Out Notice issued against Mr. Pramod Mittal or his family members.
• Eleven criminal complaints under Sections 420 and 409 IPC pending before the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

Additionally, STC assured the Court that it would not pursue winding-up proceedings against GSHL in the Isle of Man Court.

The Supreme Court, taking these submissions on record, disposed of the case with no order as to costs.

Implications of the Verdict

This judgment has significant implications for corporate debt settlements and financial dispute resolution:

• Judicial Recognition of Settlements: The ruling reinforces that once financial obligations are fully discharged, courts can quash related legal proceedings to avoid unnecessary litigation.
• Use of Article 142 for Complete Justice: The Supreme Court exercised its extraordinary jurisdiction to ensure that the parties involved faced no further legal consequences after fulfilling their obligations.
• Impact on Future Corporate Cases: This decision sets a precedent that corporate disputes, once settled financially, should not result in prolonged legal proceedings.
• Finality in Business Transactions: Companies entering into financial settlements can rely on this ruling as a precedent to seek quashing of criminal and regulatory proceedings post-payment.

By ensuring that legal proceedings are proportionate and just, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the principle that corporate settlements should lead to finality in litigation and facilitate smooth business operations.

Petitioner Name: State Trading Corporation of India Ltd..
Respondent Name: M/s Global Steel Holding Limited & Ors..
Judgment By: Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, Justice Indu Malhotra.
Place Of Incident: New Delhi, India.
Judgment Date: 12-03-2019.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: State Trading Corpor vs Ms Global Steel Hol Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 12-03-2019.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Bankruptcy and Insolvency
See all petitions in Corporate Compliance
See all petitions in unfair trade practices
See all petitions in Judgment by Abhay Manohar Sapre
See all petitions in Judgment by Indu Malhotra
See all petitions in allowed
See all petitions in Quashed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments March 2019
See all petitions in 2019 judgments

See all posts in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category