Featured image for Supreme Court Judgment dated 01-03-2017 in case of petitioner name Management of State Bank of In vs Smita Sharad Deshmukh & Anr.
| |

Forgery of Banking Certificate: Supreme Court Upholds SBI’s Decision to Dismiss Employee

Updated on

The case of Management of State Bank of India vs. Smita Sharad Deshmukh & Anr. is a crucial Supreme Court ruling that deals with the issue of forgery in employment credentials and the scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings. The judgment establishes that if an employee is found guilty of fabricating documents for monetary gains, their dismissal from service is justified.

Background of the Case

The appellant, State Bank of India (SBI), dismissed its employee, Smita Sharad Deshmukh, after an internal inquiry found that she had submitted a forged certificate from the Indian Institute of Bankers claiming to have passed the CAIIB Part-II Examination. On the basis of this forged document, she secured additional monetary benefits.

The disciplinary authority found her guilty and terminated her employment on August 1, 2003. The appellate authority upheld the dismissal on June 10, 2006. The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court also ruled in favor of SBI and declined to grant any relief to the employee. However, the Bombay High Court overturned the decision, ordering her reinstatement with 50% back wages, prompting SBI to appeal before the Supreme Court.

Legal Issues Before the Supreme Court

  • Was the High Court justified in reversing the Tribunal’s decision and ordering reinstatement?
  • Did the employee knowingly submit a forged document to claim benefits?
  • Did SBI’s disciplinary action follow due process?
  • To what extent can the High Court interfere with findings of fact in a disciplinary inquiry?

Arguments by the Petitioner (SBI)

The bank, through its legal representatives, contended:

  • The internal inquiry had established that the certificate submitted by the employee was a forged document.
  • The employee had drawn financial benefits based on the false claim of passing the CAIIB Part-II Examination.
  • The Industrial Tribunal and the disciplinary authority had correctly found her guilty based on solid evidence.
  • The High Court erred in reappreciating evidence and substituting its findings without legal justification.
  • The nature of the misconduct warranted termination, and leniency would set a wrong precedent.

Arguments by the Respondent (Smita Sharad Deshmukh)

The employee countered the allegations, arguing:

  • She was unaware that the certificate was forged and had submitted it in good faith.
  • The disciplinary proceedings were biased and did not afford her a fair chance to defend herself.
  • The High Court had rightly found that SBI failed to prove that she had knowledge of the forgery.
  • The punishment of dismissal was excessive and disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court examined the disciplinary inquiry findings and concluded that the Industrial Tribunal’s decision was legally sound. The Court noted:

“The Labour Court had clearly analysed the entire evidence and had come to the conclusion that the employee was fully aware of the forgery.”

The Supreme Court further stated:

  • The High Court had no reason to interfere with the Tribunal’s findings, as no perversity or illegality was demonstrated.
  • The employee had failed to explain how she obtained the postal receipt of the alleged certificate dispatch.
  • Her actions indicated a deliberate intent to deceive the bank for personal financial gain.

Final Judgment

On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court ruled:

  • The appeal by State Bank of India was allowed.
  • The High Court’s judgment was set aside.
  • The dismissal of the employee was upheld.
  • There would be no recovery of wages and benefits already paid to the employee.

Legal Implications of the Judgment

This ruling has important implications for employment law:

  • Forgery in Employment: Employees submitting forged documents will face termination if found guilty.
  • Limited High Court Intervention: High Courts cannot reappreciate evidence in disciplinary inquiries unless findings are perverse or illegal.
  • Judicial Discipline in Labour Matters: The ruling reaffirms that Tribunal findings should not be lightly overturned.

Impact on Future Employment Disputes

This judgment establishes key precedents:

  • Employers have the right to terminate employees for document fraud.
  • High Courts must respect findings of disciplinary authorities and Tribunals.
  • Forensic evidence plays a crucial role in fraud detection cases.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in Management of State Bank of India vs. Smita Sharad Deshmukh strengthens employer rights in disciplinary matters. It upholds the principle that fraud in employment documents is a serious offense warranting strict action. By restoring the Tribunal’s findings, the ruling ensures that disciplinary proceedings remain protected from unwarranted judicial interference.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Management of State vs Smita Sharad Deshmuk Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 01-03-2017.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Employment Disputes
See all petitions in Termination Cases
See all petitions in Public Sector Employees
See all petitions in Judgment by Kurian Joseph
See all petitions in Judgment by A M Khanwilkar
See all petitions in allowed
See all petitions in Quashed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments March 2017
See all petitions in 2017 judgments

See all posts in Service Matters Category
See all allowed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Service Matters Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Service Matters Category

Similar Posts