Eve-Teasing and Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Convicts Accused in Landmark Case

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Pawan Kumar vs. State of H.P., addressed a grave issue of eve-teasing, harassment, and abetment of suicide. This case involved the tragic suicide of a young girl who was relentlessly harassed by the accused, leading her to take her own life. The judgment highlights the serious consequences of mental harassment, the importance of gender sensitivity, and the legal implications of persistent teasing and threats.

The ruling not only reaffirmed the accused’s conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) but also emphasized the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring justice for victims of harassment and abuse. The judgment serves as a warning that eve-teasing, when persistent and severe, can amount to abetment of suicide, warranting strict legal action.

Background of the Case

The case originated in Himachal Pradesh, where a young girl in her mid-teens fell in love with the accused, Pawan Kumar. Due to youthful fixation and emotional trust, she eloped with him. However, the accused was booked for offenses under Sections 363, 366, and 376 of the IPC (kidnapping, abduction, and rape), leading to a trial where he was eventually acquitted.

After his acquittal, instead of moving on, Pawan Kumar began threatening and harassing the girl. He engaged in eve-teasing, made constant threats to abduct her again, and created an insufferable situation for the victim. The girl, unable to bear the harassment, ultimately committed suicide by self-immolation. Her dying declaration named the accused as the sole reason for her decision.

Arguments by the Petitioner (Pawan Kumar)

The defense raised several arguments, including:

• The trial court had acquitted him based on a lack of evidence.
• The dying declaration was unreliable as the victim had suffered 80% burns and was in no position to provide a statement.
• The alleged harassment did not directly instigate the girl’s suicide.
• The High Court erred in reversing the trial court’s acquittal without substantial evidence.

Arguments by the Respondent (State of H.P.)

The prosecution countered these claims with the following arguments:

• The accused was persistently harassing the girl after his acquittal, causing severe mental distress.
• The victim had provided a dying declaration in which she clearly named the accused as responsible for her suicide.
• Multiple witnesses, including the girl’s parents and the village Pradhan, had testified about the accused’s ongoing harassment.
• The High Court was justified in overturning the acquittal based on re-evaluation of the evidence.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court meticulously examined the case and made the following key observations:

“The accused had by his acts and by his continuous course of conduct created such a situation as a consequence of which the deceased was left with no other option except to commit suicide.”

“A mere reprimand or a word in a fit of anger will not earn the status of abetment. There has to be positive action that creates a situation for the victim to put an end to life.”

Regarding the validity of the dying declaration, the Court stated:

“A certificate of fitness is not the requirement of law. The trial court has been swayed away by the burn injuries. It is worthy to note that there cannot be an absolute rule that a person who has suffered 80% burn injuries cannot give a dying declaration.”

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision to convict Pawan Kumar under Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide). The Court sentenced him to:

• Seven years of rigorous imprisonment
• A fine of Rs. 10,000
• One additional year of imprisonment in case of non-payment of fine

The Court further condemned eve-teasing, recognizing it as a severe form of psychological harassment:

“Eve-teasing has become a pernicious, horrid, and disgusting practice. A woman has her own space as a man has. She enjoys as much equality under Article 14 of the Constitution as a man does.”

Legal Significance of the Judgment

The judgment has far-reaching legal implications:

• Recognition of Eve-Teasing as a Serious Offense: Persistent harassment can amount to abetment of suicide.
• Reinforcement of Dying Declarations: The Court ruled that a dying declaration remains valid even if no fitness certificate is issued.
• Judicial Approach to Gender-Based Harassment: The Court emphasized the need to protect women from persistent harassment.

Impact on Future Cases

The ruling sets an important precedent:

• Harassers who push victims to the brink of suicide will face stringent legal consequences.
• Dying declarations will hold significant weight in courts, even in cases involving severe injuries.
• The judiciary will take a proactive approach in addressing gender-based harassment and abuse.

Conclusion

The case of Pawan Kumar vs. State of H.P. stands as a landmark judgment in the fight against eve-teasing and harassment. The Supreme Court’s ruling ensures that perpetrators of psychological abuse leading to suicide will not go unpunished.

This judgment serves as a strong reminder that mental harassment is as grave as physical abuse and must be treated with the same level of seriousness.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Pawan Kumar vs State of H.P. Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 28-04-2017.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Suicide Cases
See all petitions in SC/ST Act Case
See all petitions in Custodial Deaths and Police Misconduct
See all petitions in Judgment by Dipak Misra
See all petitions in Judgment by A M Khanwilkar
See all petitions in Judgment by Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments April 2017
See all petitions in 2017 judgments

See all posts in Criminal Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Criminal Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Criminal Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Criminal Cases Category