Featured image for Supreme Court Judgment dated 29-06-2016 in case of petitioner name Power Grid Corporation of Indi vs Kamlesh Kumar Chimanbhai Patel
| |

Compensation Guidelines for Transmission Line Damage: Power Grid Corporation vs. Kamlesh Kumar Patel

Updated on

The case of Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Kamlesh Kumar Chimanbhai Patel & Ors. revolves around the issue of compensation for damage caused by the drawing of transmission lines. The Supreme Court of India adjudicated on whether compensation guidelines needed to be framed for property owners affected by such activities. The case resulted in the Government of India framing fresh guidelines during the pendency of the appeal.

The Court disposed of the appeals, granting liberty to the respondents to approach the Government of India for further grievances regarding the guidelines.

Background of the Case

The appellants, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., were engaged in the installation of high-voltage transmission lines, which required the use of private land for drawing transmission cables. Landowners, represented by Kamlesh Kumar Chimanbhai Patel & Ors., raised concerns over the damages caused by these activities, seeking compensation.

The matter reached the Supreme Court through a Special Leave Petition (SLP) No. 30704 of 2013, where the primary contention was the absence of uniform guidelines for assessing compensation related to transmission line projects.

Key Legal Issues

  • Whether compensation should be provided for damages caused by drawing transmission lines.
  • Whether the Government of India should frame guidelines on the mode and manner of compensation assessment.
  • Whether the respondents had legal recourse to challenge the guidelines if they found them inadequate.

Arguments by the Parties

Appellant’s (Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.) Arguments

  • The corporation was executing an essential public utility service in the national interest.
  • Land acquisition and transmission activities were governed by existing legal frameworks.
  • Any damages caused were incidental and did not warrant additional compensation beyond statutory provisions.

Respondent’s (Kamlesh Kumar Chimanbhai Patel & Ors.) Arguments

  • The installation of transmission lines caused damage to private property, impacting livelihoods.
  • No uniform compensation policy was in place to assess and compensate affected landowners.
  • The Government of India should formulate clear and fair guidelines for compensating damages caused by transmission projects.

Supreme Court’s Judgment

The Supreme Court ruled that during the pendency of these appeals, the Government of India had framed fresh guidelines regarding the mode and manner of assessment of compensation.

“These appeals are, hence, disposed of with liberty to the respondents to approach the Government of India, if they have any further grievance(s) with regard to the guidelines.”

Key Observations by the Court

  • The issue of compensation for damages caused by drawing transmission lines was addressed through newly framed government guidelines.
  • If landowners found the guidelines unsatisfactory, they had the right to raise grievances with the Government of India.
  • The matter did not require further judicial intervention at this stage, given the policy framework established during the litigation.

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court ruled:

  • The appeals were disposed of without further judicial review.
  • Respondents were granted liberty to raise grievances regarding the guidelines before the Government of India.
  • No costs were imposed on either party.

Conclusion and Legal Impact

This ruling reinforces several key legal principles:

  • Government agencies must ensure fair compensation for private landowners impacted by infrastructure projects.
  • Policy formulation can resolve legal disputes, reducing the need for prolonged litigation.
  • Affected parties retain the right to challenge government policies through administrative recourse.
  • Infrastructure projects must balance public interest with private property rights.

The Supreme Court’s decision ensures that a structured approach to compensation is implemented, benefiting both infrastructure developers and landowners.

Judgment delivered by: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman

Judgment Date: June 29, 2016

The ruling establishes a precedent for future infrastructure projects, ensuring compensation mechanisms are clearly defined and accessible to affected parties.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Power Grid Corporati vs Kamlesh Kumar Chiman Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 29-06-2016-1741872476918.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Damages and Compensation
See all petitions in Property Disputes
See all petitions in Public Sector Employees
See all petitions in Judgment by Kurian Joseph
See all petitions in Judgment by Rohinton Fali Nariman
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments June 2016
See all petitions in 2016 judgments

See all posts in Civil Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Civil Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Civil Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Civil Cases Category

Similar Posts