CBI Case Against Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency: Supreme Court Orders Trial Continuation

The case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. and Another vs. Central Bureau of Investigation revolved around criminal charges filed by the CBI. The appellants challenged the framing of charges, but the Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s decision and directed that the trial proceed without further delay.

The key issue in this case was whether there were sufficient grounds to interfere with the order framing charges against the appellants. The Supreme Court referred to its earlier judgment dated 28th March 2018 and found no reason to interfere. The trial court was directed to continue proceedings while keeping all contentions open for examination during the trial.

Arguments by the Appellant (Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. and Another)

• The appellants argued that the charges were framed without sufficient evidence.
• They contended that the proceedings were unjust and sought intervention by the Supreme Court.
• The defense maintained that there were procedural errors in framing the charges.

Arguments by the Respondent (Central Bureau of Investigation)

• The CBI countered that there was enough material to proceed with the trial.
• It was argued that the charges were framed based on substantial evidence.
• The prosecution maintained that the trial should not be delayed any further.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court reaffirmed its earlier ruling from March 28, 2018, and emphasized the need for speedy trials. It issued specific directives to prevent undue delays in trial proceedings.

Key Directions of the Supreme Court

• Trial courts should proceed with pending cases without unnecessary interruptions.
• If an appellate or revisional court summons original records, a photocopy or scanned copy should be kept for reference, and the original returned immediately.
• High Courts were instructed to ensure that lower courts comply with this directive to avoid delays.

Final Judgment

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the trial court’s order framing charges. The trial court was directed to continue proceedings, and both parties were instructed to appear before it on 14th May 2018. The Court also issued administrative directions to all High Courts regarding the handling of trial records to ensure smooth trial proceedings.

Petitioner Name: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. and Another.
Respondent Name: Central Bureau of Investigation.
Judgment By: Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman.
Place Of Incident: India.
Judgment Date: 25-04-2018.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: Asian Resurfacing of vs Central Bureau of In Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 25-04-2018.pdf