Featured image for Supreme Court Judgment dated 15-12-2017 in case of petitioner name M.C. Mehta vs Union of India & Ors.
| |

Supreme Court Directs Action on Unauthorized Constructions and Pollution in Delhi

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors., addressed the ongoing issue of unauthorized constructions and misuse of residential premises for commercial and industrial purposes in Delhi. The judgment reflects the Court’s deep concern over environmental degradation and the failure of authorities to enforce urban planning laws effectively.

Case Background

For decades, Delhi has faced challenges related to illegal construction, industrial activities in residential areas, and widespread commercial use of non-commercial spaces. The petitioner, M.C. Mehta, a well-known environmental activist, had approached the Court seeking urgent intervention to address the situation. The petition focused on the rampant violations of municipal laws, the Master Plan for Delhi, and environmental regulations that were contributing to severe pollution levels in the city.

Arguments of the Parties

Petitioner’s Argument:

“The unchecked misuse of residential premises for commercial and industrial purposes is causing severe environmental damage. Authorities have failed in their duty to enforce the law, leading to increased pollution and a deteriorating quality of life for Delhi’s residents. The government must be held accountable for its inaction.”

Respondent’s Argument:

“The Government of India and the Delhi administration acknowledge the concerns raised. However, policy changes, such as amendments to the Master Plan and legislative measures, have been introduced to address these issues gradually. The administration is making efforts to balance urban development with environmental sustainability.”

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court, through a bench comprising Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, expressed strong disapproval of the failure of governance in curbing illegal constructions and commercial misuse. The Court observed:

“Invaders have pillaged Delhi for hundreds of years, but for the last couple of decades, it is being ravaged by its own citizens and officials governing the capital city. We refer to unauthorized constructions and misuse of residential premises for industrial and other commercial purposes.”

The judgment emphasized that despite previous directives, the authorities had done little to enforce the law. The Court highlighted:

  • The government and municipal authorities engaged in blame-shifting rather than taking responsibility.
  • Pollution levels in Delhi had reached alarming levels due to unchecked urban expansion and lack of enforcement.
  • There was a need for strict accountability, not just of violators but also of government officials who turned a blind eye to illegal activities.

Final Judgment

The Court ruled that immediate action must be taken to seal illegal commercial establishments in residential areas. It appointed a Monitoring Committee to oversee compliance with its directives. The judgment stated:

“It is necessary to identify and take appropriate action against officers responsible for this state of affairs. Such blatant misuse of properties on a large scale cannot take place without the connivance of the officers concerned. It is also a source of corruption. Therefore, action is necessary to check corruption, nepotism, and total apathy towards the rights of the citizens.”

The Court further directed:

  • Authorities must seal unauthorized commercial properties within a specified timeline.
  • Strict penalties should be imposed on property owners violating zoning laws.
  • The Monitoring Committee must oversee compliance and submit regular reports.
  • Government agencies must prioritize public health over commercial interests.

The Court withdrew pending writ petitions from the Delhi High Court and decided to hear them directly, recognizing the urgent need for resolution. It also asked the Law Commission of India to examine regulatory mechanisms for enforcing urban planning laws effectively.

With this judgment, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to environmental protection and rule of law, sending a strong message to both citizens and authorities to uphold legal and ethical urban development.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: M.C. Mehta vs Union of India & Ors Supreme Court of India Judgment Dated 15-12-2017.pdf

Direct Downlaod Judgment: Direct downlaod this Judgment

See all petitions in Environmental Cases
See all petitions in Landlord-Tenant Disputes
See all petitions in Public Interest Litigation
See all petitions in Judgment by Madan B. Lokur
See all petitions in Judgment by Deepak Gupta
See all petitions in allowed
See all petitions in settled
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments December 2017
See all petitions in 2017 judgments

See all posts in Environmental Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Environmental Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Environmental Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Environmental Cases Category

Similar Posts