Supreme Court Dismisses Plea for CBI Probe into Maharashtra Expressway Contractual Payments
The Supreme Court of India recently dismissed a plea seeking clarification of its earlier order related to a contractual dispute involving M/s. IRB Expressway Private Limited and the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, Raj Kishor Raut, alleged a fraudulent reduction of over Rs. 70 crores in contractual payments due to a COVID-19-related exemption and sought a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the matter. The Court, however, ruled that the application was misconceived and held no bearing on the previous judgment.
Background of the Case
The case originated from a prior judgment by the Supreme Court dated August 3, 2022, which set aside a Madras High Court order directing a CBI preliminary investigation against the petitioner, Edapaddi Palaniswami, and remanded the case for reconsideration. The applicant, Raj Kishor Raut, sought a clarification of that judgment, arguing that it might hinder his pursuit of a CBI probe into an alleged fraud concerning Maharashtra road contracts.
The applicant claimed:
- IRB Expressway Private Limited fraudulently obtained a reduction in contractual payments exceeding Rs. 70 crores.
- Officials of the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) and Maharashtra Public Works Department (MPEL) conspired to facilitate this undue benefit.
- The exemption was granted under false pretexts related to COVID-19 lockdowns.
The applicant sought Supreme Court intervention to ensure that the previous ruling would not prevent him from demanding a CBI probe into this matter.
Arguments by the Applicant (Raj Kishor Raut)
- The applicant feared that the Supreme Court’s earlier order could be used to block any future investigation into the matter.
- The order dated August 3, 2022, had set aside a High Court directive for a CBI probe, and the applicant wanted reassurance that it would not affect his ability to seek an investigation into the alleged fraud.
- There was a need for independent scrutiny of the alleged fraudulent reduction in payments.
Arguments by the Respondent (IRB Expressway Private Limited)
- The company argued that the reduction in contractual payments was legitimate and granted under government orders related to the COVID-19 lockdown.
- The Government of India had issued an office memorandum on May 13, 2020, ordering the closure of all toll plazas, including the one in dispute, from March 26, 2020, to April 19, 2020.
- The invocation of the force majeure clause was in line with the contract terms, and the reduction in payments was justified.
- The applicant had already received responses from IRB and the concerned government authorities explaining the legality of the contractual modifications.
Supreme Court’s Observations and Ruling
The Supreme Court dismissed the application, stating:
- The plea had no connection to the judgment of August 3, 2022, which dealt with an entirely different case.
- The allegations related to Maharashtra’s road contracts had no legal nexus with the previous ruling.
- The Court found it surprising that the applicant sought clarification on a ruling that had nothing to do with the matter in dispute.
- The Court noted that IRB had transparently responded to the allegations and provided supporting documentation, including government orders validating the toll collection exemptions.
The Court ruled:
“The judgment and order dated 03.08.2022 passed by this court, in a totally unconnected matter, between different parties, having no nexus with the alleged complaint which the applicant proposes to make, will have no bearing on the same and thus the order dated 03.08.2022 does not call for any clarification or modification at the behest of the present applicant.”
The Court further held that the applicant had no locus standi to seek modification of an order that had no relevance to his claims.
Final Judgment
The Supreme Court:
- Dismissed the application as misconceived.
- Clarified that the judgment of August 3, 2022, did not preclude any future legal proceedings related to Maharashtra’s road contract issue.
- Rejected the applicant’s claim that he required Court intervention to approach the CBI.
Implications of the Judgment
This ruling has several important implications:
- Clarification on Judicial Process: The ruling reiterates that applicants cannot misuse unrelated judgments to support claims in separate legal matters.
- Reinforcement of Legal Standing: The Court reasserted that only parties with direct legal standing can seek modifications or clarifications of its judgments.
- Protection Against Unfounded Allegations: The decision prevents individuals from misusing the Court’s time to pursue speculative allegations.
- Judicial Economy: The ruling upholds the importance of keeping court proceedings focused on relevant and substantive matters.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Raj Kishor Raut vs. IRB Expressway Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ensures that legal processes remain transparent and focused. The Court has made it clear that unrelated judgments cannot be cited to justify new allegations, preventing misuse of judicial resources. The ruling also upholds the contractual sanctity of government decisions taken during the COVID-19 lockdown and affirms the legality of force majeure claims made under government directives. Moving forward, individuals seeking legal action must ensure that their petitions are directly relevant to the judgments they seek to modify or clarify.
Petitioner Name: Raj Kishor Raut.Respondent Name: IRB Expressway Pvt. Ltd. & Ors..Judgment By: Justice Krishna Murari, Justice Sanjay Karol.Place Of Incident: Maharashtra.Judgment Date: 23-03-2023.
Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!
Download Judgment: raj-kishor-raut-vs-irb-expressway-pvt.-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-23-03-2023.pdf
Directly Download Judgment: Directly download this Judgment
See all petitions in Corporate Compliance
See all petitions in unfair trade practices
See all petitions in Contract Disputes
See all petitions in Judgment by Krishna Murari
See all petitions in Judgment by Sanjay Karol
See all petitions in dismissed
See all petitions in Declared Infructuous
See all petitions in supreme court of India judgments March 2023
See all petitions in 2023 judgments
See all posts in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all allowed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all Dismissed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
See all partially allowed petitions in Corporate and Commercial Cases Category
