High Court’s Procedural Lapse in Civil Appeal: Supreme Court Orders Fresh Adjudication

The Supreme Court of India recently addressed a procedural irregularity in a civil appeal concerning the impleadment of a party at the appellate stage, which resulted in the remand of a case without a reasoned adjudication. This case involved IL and FS Engineering and Constructions Company Ltd. (appellant) and M/s. Bhargavarama Constructions & Ors. (respondents). The Supreme Court’s ruling highlights the importance of due process in appellate proceedings and the necessity of framing appropriate points for determination under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).

Background of the Case

The dispute originated when IL and FS Engineering and Constructions Company Ltd. filed a suit for the recovery of Rs.47,90,088, along with interest at 18%, against the respondents. The trial court ruled in favor of the appellant, decreeing the suit. Dissatisfied with this decision, the original defendants (respondent Nos. 1 and 2) filed an appeal before the High Court, seeking to overturn the trial court’s judgment and decree.

High Court’s Decision and Procedural Anomaly

During the appeal proceedings in the High Court, the respondents filed an application for impleadment of A.P. Transco and MAYTAS Infra Pvt. Ltd., asserting that the subject work initially originated from A.P. Transco. Without providing a reasoned order explaining why A.P. Transco was a necessary party, the High Court allowed the impleadment and, as a consequence, quashed the trial court’s judgment and decree. The case was then remanded to the trial court for fresh adjudication.

Read also: https://judgmentlibrary.com/supreme-court-dismisses-review-petition-in-family-property-dispute-case/

Supreme Court’s Observations and Ruling

The Supreme Court found the High Court’s approach legally flawed and procedurally improper. The Court emphasized that:

• The High Court set aside the trial court’s judgment and decree merely because it allowed the impleadment application, without examining the merits of the appeal.
• No reasons were provided for the necessity of adding A.P. Transco as a party to the appeal and original suit.
• The principle of dominus litis (the plaintiff’s right to choose defendants) was overlooked.
• Under Order XLI Rule 31 of the CPC, the first appellate court must frame points for determination, assess the evidence, and provide a reasoned judgment, which was not done in this case.

Supreme Court’s Directions

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s order, including the impleadment of A.P. Transco, and remanded the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration. The Court imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.25,000 on the original defendants, payable to the State Legal Services Authority.

Key Takeaways from the Judgment

• The appellate courts must adjudicate appeals on merits and not dispose of them solely based on procedural applications.
• Framing points for determination and giving a reasoned order are essential under Order XLI Rule 31 CPC.
• Impleadment of parties at the appellate stage should be scrutinized properly, ensuring it aligns with procedural law.

This judgment serves as a critical precedent, reinforcing procedural discipline in appellate adjudications and upholding due process in civil litigation.

Petitioner Name: IL and FS Engineering and Constructions Company Ltd..
Respondent Name: M/s. Bhargavarama Constructions & Ors..
Judgment By: Justice M.R. Shah, Justice B.V. Nagarathna.
Place Of Incident: Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.
Judgment Date: 16-12-2021.

Don’t miss out on the full details! Download the complete judgment in PDF format below and gain valuable insights instantly!

Download Judgment: il-and-fs-engineerin-vs-ms.-bhargavarama-co-supreme-court-of-india-judgment-dated-16-12-2021.pdf